Showing : 11-20 of 24 Results

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 43, Rule 1-- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Dismissal of application for condonation of Delay - It is revision and not appeal which lies against dismissal of application for condonation of delay...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Delay - Condonation - While considering the delay condonation application court has to see the merit of the case also as the law of limitation is not meant to take away the right of appeal - The courts are meant for imparting justice and not to scuttle the..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 8, Rule 1, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Madras High Court (Original Statement) Rules, 1956, Order 5, Rule 1-- Written Statement - Delay of about five years in filing - Condonation of delay - Appellants did not choose to file written statement for nearly five years - They have not filed written statement till they were set ex-parte - Reason assigned by them is as per the legal advice, they did not file..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 5, Rule 2, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section , Order 9, Rule 13, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Ex parte decree - Setting aside of - Summons not duly served with copy of plaint - Condonation of delay - Appellant had given contradictory statements - Facts were not properly disclosed in affidavit filed in support of application for condonation of delay of 1281 days in filing application to..........
NATIONAL DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15, 21(b)-- Appeal - Limitation - Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - Petitioner proceeded ex parte before the District Forum - Copy of order dated 20th April, 2010 of the District Forum was received by the petitioner on 31st March, 2010 whereas appeal before the State Commission was filed after 103..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Delay - Condonation - Delay of 8 years condoned but application for setting aside ex parte decree dismissed - Held, it would be in the interest of justice to allow appeal filed by he appellant and allow the application U.9.R.13 CPC, of course, with a heavy costs..........
PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15-- Appeal - Limitation - Order passed by District Forum on 11.11.2009 but appeal filed on 25.3.2010 - No application for condonation of delay filed and pleaded in the appeal that the impugned order came to the knowledge of the appellant on 2.3.2010 when he was served through bailable warrants by..........
THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15-- Ex parte order - Appeal - Limitation - Condonation of delay - Appeal filed with a delay of 605 days - Application for condonation of delay vague - Notice was duly served on OP by the learned District Forum - Plea that he was not aware of the complaint pending repelled - Appeal liable to be..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Delay - Condonation - Delay in filing appeal against ex parte decree - Earlier application for setting aside ex parte proceedings was dismissed and thereafter matter remained pending for five years - Plea that counsel did not inform her about passing of the ex parte decree - `Sufficient cause' in..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21-- Ex parte order - Appeal - Condonation of delay - Delay of 595 days in filing appeal - Delay certainly undue delay - Glaring facts brought to notice - Delay condoned - Miscarriage of justice occasioned in the case - Impugned order passed by the State Commission set aside - Complaint remitted to the..........

Showing : 11-20 of 24 Results