Showing : 51-59 of 59 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 13, Rule 4, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 66-- Marking of a document as exhibit - Cannot be held to be its due proof - Its execution has to be proved by admissible evidence - Situation is however different where the documents are produced, and they are admitted by opposite party, signatures on them are also admitted and they are marked..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 13, Rule 14-- Admissibility of a document - Can be classified into two classes (1) Document when in itself is inadmissible in evidence (2) Mode of proof - In the first case if a document is exhibited, an objection to its admissibility is not excluded and is available to be raised even at a later stage or even..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 13(1)(i), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 13, Rule 4-- Document - Proof - Mere marking of document as exhibit does not make the document admissible in evidence - A document must be proved by formal mode of proof enjoined by the provisions of Evidence Act...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 13, Rule 1-- Photocopy of sale deed - Marked as exhibit without any objection - Once a document is allowed to be exhibited in evidence without any objection from any of the parties to the suit during the trial, it is too late at the appellate stage for any party to make any grievance about the non production..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Pronote-- Insufficiently stamped - Marked as exhibit without any objection - When once such a document is admitted and received as evidence without any objection, any objection regarding the sufficiency of the value of the stamp cannot be raised at a later stage - Suit filed on the basis of such pronote not..........
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73-- Sale deed - Proof - Attesting witness or any other witness proving execution of sale deed not examined - Relevant register of Registration Authority also not produced - Mere marking of document as exhibit not sufficient to dispense with the proof - Sale deed is not proved...........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1994
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 13, Rule 4-- Mere marking of a document as an exhibit does not dispense with its proof...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1972
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 13, Rule 4-- Omission to rigidly follow requirements of Order 13 Rule 4 - Does not per se render the document inadmissible - Endorsement if in any way defective - Does not itself lead to the conclusion that the document has not been admitted in evidence. No doubt it is necessary that endorsements on documents..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 0000
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Document marked when referred to in cross examination though not earlier marked as an exhibit - Consistent practice followed in the Courts in Maharashtra - Marking of document as exhibit by such a process does not dispense with the requirement of proof of execution, contents..........

Showing : 51-59 of 59 Results