Showing : 21-30 of 41 Results

HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Insurance claim-- Repudiation - Driving licence fake - Not only the first investigator on the basis of the endorsement of the concerned DTO reported that the licence in question has not been issued - The same reaffirmed in response to direction of the District Forum - Licence in the instant case was fake - The..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166, 149-- Fake driving licence - By itself does not absolve the insurer to reimburse the owner of a vehicle in respect of the amount awarded in favour of a third party by the Tribunal in exercise of its jurisdiction u/s 166 of the Act with liberty to recover the same from the owner and the driver of the..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 149-- Fake driving licence - Owner is bound to make reasonable enquiry whether the driver had a valid driving licence - Such a licence not only must be an effective one but should also be a valid one - So far as a driving licence of a professional driver is concerned, the owner of the vehicle, despite..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Insurance claim-- Repudiation - Driving licence - Fake driving licence had no existence in the eyes of law - What is initially fake, by its renewal does no become valid - Order of the District Forum allowing the complaint liable to be set aside...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 149(2)(ii)-- Fake driving licence - Renewal cannot transform a fake licence as genuine...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 149(2)(a)(ii)-- Accident - Fake driving licence - Renewal of fake driving licence cannot transform it as genuine - Insurance company not liable to indemnify the owner - But in case of third party risk the insurer has to indemnify the amount and if so advised, to recover the same from the insured...........
****************SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g), Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 149-- Insurance claim - Driving licence fake - Renewal of driving licence - Compensation to the owner for his own loss - The Courts below committed an error in holding the appellant liable to indemnify the owner of the vehicle for the losses sustained by him...........
HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Insurance claim-- Repudiation - Driving licence fake - Licence of 'S' proved to be fully fake on the date of accident - OP fully justified in repudiating the claim...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 147, 149-- Accident - Compensation - Third party - Any condition in policy whereby right of third party is taken away would be void - Statute is beneficial one qua the third party but that benefit cannot be extended to the owner' of the offending vehicle - Logic of fake driving licence has to be considered..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 149, 163A, 166-- Liablility of insured vis-a-vis insurer - How to be enforced - Breach of terms of insurance policy - Tribunal awarded compensation - Fake driving licence - Insurance company paid compensation to claimants - Filed execution against owner for recovery of compensation paid - Objections filed - No..........

Showing : 21-30 of 41 Results