Showing : 11-16 of 16 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 52, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 51, Order 21, Rule 35-- Lispendens - Execution of decree for possession - Construction existing or raised over the land or has been raised during the pendency of the case over the land - Would not stand in way of execution of decree - Decree Holder entitled to earn fruits of decree...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 51(d), Order 40, Rule 1-- Execution - Court receiver - Execution by appointment of Court Receiver is within the discretion of the Court - The discretion has to be judiciously exercised - The appointment of receiver in execution is one of the modes of executing the decree in a fit case - It allows the decree holder the..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 29-- Decree - Execution - Stay - Decree remains in force till it is set aside - It should not be lightly dealt with on the basis of surmises and conjectures that in the suit filed subsequently the same may be set aside - A person should not be deprived of the fruits of the decree merely because of..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1997
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 20, 21, 22-- Specific performance of agreement of mortgage with possession of suit property - Not proper after a lapse of more than 25 years to direct defendant to execute usufructuary mortgage in favour of plaintiff - Decree for specific performance declined - Defendant retained money and enjoyed fruits of..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1988
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 38, Rule 5-- Attachment before judgment - affidavit - absence of allegation or assertion in the affidavit about the removal of property outside the jurisdiction of the Court or that the defendants are likely to do any act which would frustrate the plaintiff from realising the fruits of the decree that may be..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1976
Details
Punjab Land Reforms Act, 1972, Section 4-- No bar to suit for redemption - Question whether by redemption mortgagor would be possessed of land in excess of permissible ceiling - To be decided at the time of execution of redemption decree - Redemption decree should be passed if the claim of plaintiff-mortgagor is proved - Redemption of..........

Showing : 11-16 of 16 Results