Showing : 21-30 of 246 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 227, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364A-- Discharge - Kidnapping for ransom - Ransom note - Veracity - Two State Forensic Science Laboratories opined that ransom note in question was not in handwriting of accused - Opinion of expert is not substantive evidence, which Court is not bound to accept - Moreover, expert opinion is to be..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(d), 13(2), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 468-- Misconduct - Pecuniary advantage - Abusing official position - Accused cheated complainant and his brother by dishonestly inducting them to pay money for handing over possession of shop - Possession of shop was with accused due to his official position in Revenue Section - Accused having full..........
TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45-- Expert opinion on photographic copies - Not only original document can be sent for expert examination but photographic copies may also be sent for examination of handwriting expert...........
TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45-- Expert opinion - Opinion of second handwriting expert - It is duty of Court to ascertain the truth or otherwise of opinion submitted by second handwriting expert at time of deciding main suit and not at the stage of trial...........
TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45-- Private handwriting expert - Whether private handwriting expert is qualified or not and whether his report can be taken in consideration or not, all these aspects can be elicited during cross-examination by defendant...........
TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 73-- Comparison of handwriting - Court is entitled to make comparison of disputed and admitted signature for just conclusion but as a rule of prudence expert opinion can be obtained and also that Court can instruct a party to submit his writing or signature, enabling Court to compare and decide a case...........
TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 73-- Comparison of signatures by Court - Inspite of availability of expert evidence, Court can also compare signature - Opinion of expert is only a guiding factor and it is for the Court to examine entire evidence on record including evidence of handwriting expert and come to a just conclusion...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45-- Dishonour of cheque - Disputed signatures - Handwriting expert - Receipt acknowledging receiving cheque amount - Complainant alleging it forged signatures - Delay in filing application as accused was absconding - However, getting signatures on receipt compared with admitted and specimen signatures..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45-- Dishonour of cheque - Expert opinion - Accused without himself entering into witness box, seeking sending of cheque to Handwriting expert - Application cannot be allowed...........
TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 73-- Comparison of signature - Courts to take assistance of experts - S.73 of the Evidence Act does not bar the judge from ultimately deciding whether the signatures are forged or not - Still as a rule of prudence in disputed cases, it is always desirable that Court should secure opinion of quality..........

Showing : 21-30 of 246 Results