Showing : 41-50 of 238 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, Section 13-- Eviction - Personal necessity - Previous ejectment application filed on ground of material impairment and sub letting whereas present application is on ground of personal necessity also - Held, cause of action of personal necessity accrued to landlords and no adverse inference can be drawn against..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, Section 13, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 27- - Eviction - Personal necessity - Appeal - Additional evidence - Application to prove that son of landlord is gainfully employed in his business and there is no need of demised premises - It is apparent from record that tenant was aware that son of landlord was working as property dealer from..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, Section 13-- Eviction - Bona fide requirement - Held, a landlord who is himself in occupation of only a tenanted premise and who gave evidence to the effect that he has taken only a temporary accommodation till he secures eviction of his own premise, there is nothing to suspect his bona fides - Eviction proper..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, Section 13-- Eviction - Change of user - Held, if landlord had let property for residential use only and moment Court finds that tenant's contention that it is no, residential property is not correct then there is a ground established for eviction that tenant is guilty of change of user - Eviction proper -..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, Section 15(6)-- Eviction - Ex parte order - Execution proceedings - Objection taken by petitioner/tenant that he was not served in main eviction petition - Tenant was in fact proceeded ex-parte way back on 04.04.2006 - After a long time eviction order was passed against him - Held, it is not believable that..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, Section 15(6)-- Eviction - Execution proceeding - Tenant's plea that landlord/decree holder is not his landlord and thus eviction petition was not maintainable - Held, challenge to maintainability of proceeding itself can be made in main ejectment proceedings and not in execution application - Executing Court..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, Section 13-- Eviction - Bona fide need - Subsequent events - Landlady aged 77-78 years sought eviction on ground of her personal necessity - She was residing with her son for the last 30-45 years in another residential house - She being aged was unable to walk and thus totally dependent upon her son - During..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, Section 13, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 8- - Eviction - Arbitration clause - Held, arbitration clause does not become defunct or inoperative merely because lease period under lease deed has expired...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, Section 13- - Eviction - Regular second appeal - Concurrent finding of fact recorded by both Courts below that present suit has been filed within ten years of construction in respect of demised shop - Held, such finding of fact cannot be interfered in regular second appeal...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, Section 13, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 106- - Eviction - Notice - Contention on behalf of appellant that notice was issued to one `D' and not to him - Factum of receipt of notice has not been denied - In written statement itself, it is mentioned that notice u/s.106 of T.P. Act was received but that notice was factually wrong and legally..........

Showing : 41-50 of 238 Results