Showing : 2751-2760 of 13903 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 102, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 392, 397, 34-- Search before arrest - Robbery - S.102 Cr.P.C. provides, that if there is reasonable suspicion to police officer that person is in possession of stolen property or is involved in commission of a cognizable offence, he can immediately carry out search without effecting a formal arrest and seize the..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 221(2), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 304B, 302-- Charge - Charge u/s.304B and conviction u/s.302 - Offence u/s.302 IPC cannot be said to be minor offence vis-a-vis an offence u/s.304B - Alternative conviction of accused recorded by Trial Court u/s.302 IPC by invoking provisions of S.221(2) of Cr.P.C cannot be sustained...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 392, 397, 34-- Robbery - Claim of parity with co-accused - Co-accused driver of TSR, acquitted because no specific role of either threatening or committing robbery attributed to him - He was plying the accused in his auto rickshaw and only stopped at their instance - Accused `R' was convicted for the offence u/s..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34-- Double murder case - Circumstantial evidence - Recovery of blood stained clothes of accused at his instance - Blood report of both the deceased was not produced - Even blood group of accused was also not ascertained - Mere matching of blood group on blood stained clothes, which was even on bed..........
UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 147, 148, 149, 323, Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 3(1)X, 3(2), 4-- Quashing of summoning order - Offence u/ss 147, 148, 149, 323 IPC, Ss.3(1)X, 3(2), 4 of SC/ST Act - Allegation that petitioners came on the spot and started firing and gave beatings to women - Stones were pelted and petitioners used firearms and sharped edged weapons - However, neither any firearm..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 27-- Double murder case - Circumstantial evidence - Disclosure statement - Recovery of laptop - Does not have any bearing, as it is neither weapon of crime nor it has any cause of connection with commission of crime - Merely because laptop belongs to sister of deceased is not indicative that accused is..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34-- Double murder case - Circumstantial evidence - Finger prints of accused on cello tape found in the house of deceased - Not proved, as print marks on it, not found to be matching with specimen of accused - Only one mark is matched which was missing in the Court - This circumstance is also not..........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 326-- Dangerous weapon - Lathi is capable of causing death of a person and it depends upon several factors viz. (i) whether its any end of the two is fitted with a hard and sharp or hard and pointed metallic object or covered around with thick sheet of any hard metal up to a few inches and the most..........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 325, 326-- Nature of offence - Bamboo sticks used by accused in causing fracture to injured - It was not mentioned in seizure memo that bamboo stick was fitted with hard and sharp or hard and pointed object or any end or both ends is/are covered with thick metal sheet - Fracture sustained by injured is not..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 326-- Grievous hurt - Plea that accused is mentally challenged person - Said plea neither taken during trial nor before appellate Court - Burden of proving this fact lies on accused - Plea directly raised before High Court is not acceptable, particularly, when revision against conviction is preferred by..........

Showing : 2751-2760 of 13903 Results