Showing : 881-890 of 14342 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 228A, 376, 376A, 376AB, 376B, 376C, 376D, 376E, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Section 33, 37-- Disclosure of identity of victim - Rape victim or victims of sexual abuse - FIR relating to offences u/ss 376, 376-A, 376-AB, 376-B, 376-C, 376-D, 376-DA, 376-DB or 376-E IPC and offences under POCSO shall not be put in public domain...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 372, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 228A-- Appeal filed by rape victim or victims of sexual abuse - Identity of victim - It is not necessary for victim to disclose his/her identity and appeal shall be dealt with in the manner laid down by law...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 228A, 376, 376A, 376AB, 376B, 376C, 376D, 376E, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Section 33, 37-- Disclosure of identity of victim - Rape victim or victims of sexual abuse - True identity of victims should not be disclosed, so that they are not subjected to unnecessary ridicule, social ostracisation and harassment - Directions issued...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 9, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 307, 149, 148-- Test Identification Parade (TIP) - Delay of 55 days in conducting TIP - Murder case - Prosecution did not take any effort to arrest or interrogate accused for 6 weeks despite their involvement was brought to light - No reasonable explanation given for inordinate delay of 55 days in conducting TIP..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 307, 149, 148-- Murder - Incompatibility between post mortem report and FSL report - Post-mortem report describes that there were only two wounds in the body of deceased, one being entry and other exit wound - Allegedly a bullet was still recovered from ashes of deceased - FSL report shows that bullet was charred..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, Section 12, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 377, 34, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Section 3, 4-- Juvenile - Bail - Unnatural offence - No exceptional circumstances found to decline bail to a juvenile as indicated in S.12 of JJ Act - Bail held, granted to juvenile...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 307, 149, 148-- Murder - Defective investigation - Place of occurrence not ascertained - Prosecution failed to examine one person which was also injured in the same incident - No independent witness adduced by prosecution - Though charges u/s 307 IPC is framed but prosecution failed to substantiate the same by..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000, Section 2(33), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 307-- Heinous offence - Attempt to murder - Minimum punishment is not prescribed u/s 307 IPC, but punishment may extend to 10 years and fine - Thus, due to benchmark of minimum punishment of 7 years or more, S.307 IPC cannot fall within ambit of heinous offences...........
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376(2)(f), 511, 506, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Section 4, 6, 8, 12-- Rape of minor girl - Two separate incidents on two different dates - Victim was raped by accused in her residence on the first incident and she sustained injury in her private part - Medical evidence corroborated said injury - However, said incident was not disclosed by victim due to threat given..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000, Section 2(33), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 307-- Transfer of case to Children's Court - Attempt to murder - Petitioners though are between age group of 16 to 18 years, they have not committed heinous offences, as S.307 IPC cannot fall within ambit of heinous offences - Case of petitioners, thus, not covered u/s 15 of the JJ Act - No order..........

Showing : 881-890 of 14342 Results