Showing : 1161-1170 of 13776 Results

MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(d), 13(2), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 468-- Misconduct - Pecuniary advantage - Abusing official position - Accused cheated complainant and his brother by dishonestly inducting them to pay money for handing over possession of shop - Possession of shop was with accused due to his official position in Revenue Section - Accused having full..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 294A, 420, 120B-- Quashing of FIR - At the stage of investigation - Validity - Offence u/ss 294-A, 420, 120-B IPC - Accused allegedly printed lottery tickets and sold it without permission and amassed enormous profit from the same - Huge amount of cash of Rs.7.2 crores recovered from house of accused and such..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 298, 323, 324, 341, 307, 302, 34-- Bail - Offence u/ss 298, 323, 324, 341, 307, 302, 34 IPC - Incident occurred over issue of seats sharing etc. in train and there is neither any evidence of any preplanning to cause incident deliberately or intentionally to cause communal disharmony - There is not even remote whisper that..........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376(1), Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 3(1)(xii)-- Rape of Scheduled Tribe woman - Prosecutrix became pregnant and gave birth to child due to alleged incident of rape - She was not proved to be below 16 years of age at the time of occurrence - FIR lodged 2 months after taking birth of child and after 1 year of alleged incident - Prosecutrix and..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000, Section 20, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 455-- Plea of juvenility - Raised for the first time in Supreme Court - State admitted age of accused as on date of offence and they were juveniles on the date of occurrence - Incident occurred almost 2 decades back - Entire proceedings including punishment/sentence awarded should not be interfered with..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34-- Murder - Interested witnesses - Motive of crime is clear as on previous day of occurrence also, parties met at police station regarding some issue - Evidence of ocular witnesses narrates guilt of accused beyond reasonable doubt and corroborates with medical evidence - Testimonies of interested..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34-- Murder - Evidence of eye witness/PW3 - PW3 narrated incident that deceased was attacked by accused explaining role played by each of accused - Evidence of PW3 also credible and corroborated with medical evidence - Evidence of PW3 cannot be disbelieved merely on the ground that DW1 stated that on..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376(1)-- Rape - Rupture of hymen is not the conclusive proof of sexual intercourse, as it can be ruptured by any other mode than sexual intercourse...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376(1), Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2002, Section 3, 4-- Rape - Determination of age of prosecutrix - Best important documentary evidence to determine age of prosecutrix not coming on record - Reasons not supplemented by prosecution for not producing said record - Adverse inference thus, drawn against prosecution - As regards ossification test conducted..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376(1), Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2002, Section 3, 4-- Rape - Prosecutrix was in habit of leaving the house and she herself admitted that she was knowing the accused and used to talk to him and they used to meet regularly - No evidence on record to show that under coercion prosecutrix left her house - Prosecutrix stayed with accused for 23 days -..........

Showing : 1161-1170 of 13776 Results