Showing : 1-10 of 268 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 9-- Test Identification Parade (TIP) - TIP of accused before Court is not the main substantive piece of evidence, rather it is corroborative in nature...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 9, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 392, 34-- Test Identification Parade (TIP) - Murder and robbery - When accused have not disputed their identity in cross-examination of PW9 and PW1, it is thus, too late for them to allege now that no TIP was conducted...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 9-- Test identification parade (TIP) - Where there are no allegations that accused were in muffled faces and police does not immediately arrange TIP, because if accused is identified in TIP it becomes substantive evidence...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 379B, 395, 397, Arms Act, 1959, Section 25-- Bail - Offence u/ss 379-B, 395, 397 IPC and S.25 Arms Act - Apart from disclosure statement there is no evidence against the petitioner - Even, no test identification parade was conducted - Keeping in view the facts and period of incarceration already suffered by petitioner it deems fit to release..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 9-- Test identification parade (TIP) - If accused is identified in TIP it becomes substantive evidence...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Recovery of mobile phone which was allegedly used for making demands of ransom not proved, as same was not subscribed by deceased - Bullet recovered from body of deceased matched with service weapon which was allocated to PW11, Police, but theory that weapon was..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 9, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 395, 396, 397, 398, 307, 376(2)(g), 34-- Test Identification Parade (TIP) - Murder of five persons, robbery and rape of one lady - Dummies resembling accused has to be selected by Special Executive Magistrate who conducts TI parade - However, dummy persons were selected by police - No statement that dummies resembled accused - Neither..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 9, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 395, 396, 397, 398, 307, 376(2)(g), 34-- Test Identification Parade (TIP) - Source of light at the spot - Murder of five persons, robbery and rape of one lady - PW1 and PW8 identified accused in TIP as well as before Court - Incident occurred at 10.30 p.m - There was light or not in hut not mentioned in Panchnama - Accused allegedly used..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376, 323, 342, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 9-- Rape of 7 years old girl - Test Identification Parade (TIP) - Photograph of accused shown to prosecutrix by her father before TIP - Prosecutrix in her examinatio, i, chief not disclosed name of accused and even his physical appearance - She however, identified accused in Court - TIP cannot be..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 9, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 307, 149, 148-- Test Identification Parade (TIP) - Delay of 55 days in conducting TIP - Murder case - Prosecution did not take any effort to arrest or interrogate accused for 6 weeks despite their involvement was brought to light - No reasonable explanation given for inordinate delay of 55 days in conducting TIP..........

Showing : 1-10 of 268 Results