Showing : 91-100 of 598 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(2), 13(1)(d)-- Illegal gratification - Mere possession of tainted money is not enough to prove the guilt of accused in the absence of proof of demand and acceptance of money as illegal gratification...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7-- Illegal gratification - Demand of illegal gratification is sine qua non for constituting offence u/s 7 of the Act - Mere recovery of currency notes cannot constitute offence u/s 7 of the Act unless it is proved beyond all reasonable doubt that accused voluntarily accepted money knowing it to be..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 409, 120B, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13-- Cheating - Illegal gratification - No evidence on record as to giving and taking of bribe or even of involvement of any of accused - PWs stated that they are not acquainted with accused as they did not conduct any enquiry at the end - Even I.O also stated that there was sufficient evidence but he..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d)-- Illegal gratification - Accused being lineman of telecom department demanded Rs.1500 from complainant for telephone connection - However, evidence on record shows that accused had not accepted or obtained pecuniary gratification but amount was thrusted into the hands of accused - Moreover, phone..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(2), 13(1)(d)-- Illegal gratification - Mere recovery of money divorced from circumstances under which it is paid is not sufficient to convict accused when substantive evidence in case is not reliable...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2)-- Illegal gratification - Demand of bribe is sine qua non to convict the accused for offence u/ss 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of the Act...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2)-- Illegal gratification - Accused a constable allegedly demanded Rs.5000 from complainant to release his brother - However, there is contradictions in the evidence of complainant himself, which does not prove the factum of demand of bribe by accused - Panch witness did not hear the conversation..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 120B-- Illegal gratification - Order framing charge - Prima facie sufficient evidence available on record showing involvement of accused in the incident - Conversation allegedly taken place between the parties prima facie shows that bribe was demanded by accused for complainant through co-accused -..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(2)-- Illegal gratification - Officer who recorded FIR himself investigating matter and filed police report - Such a practice can easily lead to unfair and partial investigation...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 154, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(2)-- FIR - Illegal gratification - FIR lodged by I.O after investigation of case - There was no official record about receipt of previous complaints or of decision to lay a trap or police party and panchas leaving office of Anti Corruption Bureau - Such FIR is therefore, totally valueless for..........

Showing : 91-100 of 598 Results