Showing : 511-520 of 603 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, Section 5(2), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 161-- Illegal gratification - Conviction - Accused now 75 years of age - Accused facing mental stress on account of pendency of appeal for 15 years and sword of conviction hanging on his head for all these years - Sentence reduced from five years to one year...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2)-- Illegal gratification - Demand - Made through 'tout' - Makes no difference - Demand of bribe can be either directly or indirectly - If it is proved that demand was made either directly or indirectly, the ingredients of provision of S.7 of Prevention of Corruption Act are satisfied...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 120B-- Illegal gratification - A non-public servant can be convicted u/s 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act read with S.120-B of Indian Penal Code...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, Section 5(1)(d), 5(2), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 161-- Reduction of sentence - Illegal gratification - Conviction - Accused faced agony of case for 19 years - Accused remained in jail for a few days at the time of incident - Sentence reduced to period already undergone...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 11, 13-- Illegal gratification - Trap proceedings - Arranged within 40 minutes - Trap party proceeded in official car - Eight persons travelled in the car - Why so many persons had to travel together not known - A trap proceeding envisages secrecy and not a wide publicity - Illegalities committed in the..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 20-- Illegal gratification - Recovery of tainted money - Presumption - In absence of proof of demand, question of raising presumption does not arise...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2)-- Illegal gratification - Voluntary and conscious acceptance of money when proved then there is no further burden cast on prosecution to prove by direct evidence, the demand or motive - It has only to be deduced from the facts and circumstances of the case...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2)-- Illegal gratification - Voluntary and conscious acceptance of money - When amount is found to have been passed to the public servant the burden is on public servant to establish that it was not by way of illegal gratification...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 4(1), 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2)-- Illegal gratification - Where recovery of money coupled with other circumstances lead to the conclusion that accused received gratification from some person, Court will draw a presumption under Section 4(1) of the Prevention of Corruption Act...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 19, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 197-- Illegal gratification - Public servant - Sanction for prosecution - Some of the materials on the basis of which sanction was granted not proved - Do not vitiate the order of sanction...........

Showing : 511-520 of 603 Results