Showing : 171-180 of 296 Results

PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Exparte decree - Setting aside - Non impleading of co-defendants - Application is maintainable - Proviso to the rule gives discretion to the Court to decide about the effect of the decree on other defendants but nowhere provides that for passing of such an order other defendants should also be..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10(2)-- Impleading of a party - Necessary party - If a person has a right or interest in the subject matter of suit then such a person is a necessary party...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleading of party - Suit for specific performance - A co-owner is not a necessary party...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10(2)-- Impleading of a party - Plea of non-joinder of necessary parties raised by defendant - An issue also framed to that effect - Merely on such a plea applicant cannot be impleaded as a party against the wishes of plaintiff - If ultimately presence of applicant is found vital to the adjudication, the..........
UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10(2)-- Impleading of a party - Suit for specific performance of agreement to sell - When interest of third party is not involved in the suit then application for impleadment cannot be allowed...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10(2)-- Impleading of a party - Applicant happens to be wife and claiming rights on the basis of Will executed by the person whose property is in dispute - Moreso plaintiffs of two suits out of three consolidated suits have no objection if petitioner is impleaded as a party - Application allowed...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10(2)-- Impleading of a party - Suit for specific performance - Suit alleged to be filed by plaintiff in collusion with defendants and that too on the basis of forged documents - Sale agreement alleged to be fabricated in collusion with each other - It is further the case of the applicants that actually..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleadment of a party - Suit for specific performance on basis of oral agreement to sell - Applicant bonafide purchaser of half of land in question on the basis of previous in time, agreement to sell executed in his favour and in possession thereof - Questions involved in the suit cannot be..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Article 21, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10, Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Section 8-- Impleadment of Reversioner as party to suit - Suit for possession being nearest reversioners - Application under Order 1 Rule 10 for impleading party being sister's son of the deceased - Application filed 5 years after death of original owner - Declined by Trial Court being barred by limitation -..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleading of party Dominant litus - Suit for permanent injunction - Application under O.1 R.10 for impleading as defendant being co-owner - Allowed by Trial Court - Plaintiff has right to choose parties against whom he seeks injunction - Being a co-owner in itself is no ground to be impleaded as..........

Showing : 171-180 of 296 Results