Showing : 51-60 of 332 Results

MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17-- Amendment of plaint - Partition suit - During pendency of suit defendant sold the suit property by way of sale deed in favour of her husband - Amendment sought to add prayer for declaration that said sale deed is sham and nominal - Application for impleading husband of defendant as party to suit..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleading of a party - Suit for partition - Subsequent bona fide purchasers - Scope of relief in a suit for partition cannot be changed to a suit for eviction and possession by impleading third parties, who are neither necessary nor proper parties to the original suit...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 10-- Amendment of plaint - Suit for specific performance - Sale during pendency of suit - Impleading subsequent transferee - Subsequent transferee can be impleaded as party in suit - It is wholly unnecessary for plaintiff to challenge conveyance/sale deed executed by defendants during pendency of suit..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 2A-- Breach of injunction - Transferee pendente lite - Sale after passing of order of status quo - Vendee not a party to the suit - An application for impleading vendee as a party to the suit was disallowed - There was no order against vendee - Vendee could not be said to have disobeyed the status quo..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 9-- Non-joinder of necessary party - Cancellation of plot allotment in favour of subsequent purchaser without impleading him as a party defendant in suit despite knowledge about subsequent sale at the time of filing of suit - Non-joinder of subsequent purchaser, who is necessary party is fatal to case..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 146, Order 1, Rule 10, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 10-- Impleading a party - Transferee pendente lite - If the person sought to be impleaded as party is legal representative of a party to the suit, it is sufficient for Court to order impleadment/substitution of such person - A transferee pendente lite is a legal representative of the party...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleading of a party - Suit for specific performance - Trust property - Beneficiary of trust has right to be impleaded as party - He cannot be treated as stranger...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10(2)-- Impleading a party - Suit for mandatory injunction - Applicant having share in the property in dispute - Order allowing impleadment, upheld...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10(2)-- Impleading a party - Does not depend solely on the question whether applicant has interest in the suit property - However, question to be considered is whether right of said person may be affected if he is not added as party - Such right includes necessarily an enforceable legal right...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleading a party - Suit for specific performance - Subsequent purchaser - At the stage of seeking leave to implead/carry out consequential amendment, it is not necessary to advert to any evidence in determining whether subsequent purchaser was indeed a bona fide purchaser...........

Showing : 51-60 of 332 Results