Showing : 51-60 of 61 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10, Telegraph Act, 1885, Section 16-- Telegraph Department cutting and felling trees - Damage and compensation regarding the same determination procedure - Non-impleadment of necessary parties - Objection as to - Cannot be raised by party once it has taken chance by filing written statement and having lost before District Judge...........
DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Medical negligence-- Impleadment of necessary parties - Under the Act or the Rules framed thereunder no right is given to the Insurance Company to be impleaded as a party to an action against the doctor/tort-feasor...........
DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 14, Civil Procedure Code 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleadment of necessary parties - Provisions of Order 1 Rule 10 CPC have not been made applicable to proceedings under the Act - It is for the Legislature to consider and to make a suitable provision for doing complete justice between the insured Doctor and Insurance Company in one litigation of..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Application for impleadment by Punjab Wakf Board claiming to be owner of property as per Central Gazette Notification and relying on judgment of Civil Court which held Punjab Wakf Board to be owner of these properties and further plaintiffs themselves moved applications to Wakf Board for allotment..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleadment as party - A party who claims ownership in relation to subject - matter of suit and prima facie shows documents in support thereof - Should normally be treated to be a party whose presence before Court would be proper for settling controversy in suit - Merits of claims are of no..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Suit for specific performance of agreement to sell - Applicants sought the impleadment in the suit on the allegations that they have purchased a portion of the suit land and they have become owners and are in possession of the respective portions of the land after the suits filed by them were..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10(2)-- Impleadment in a suit between co-owners based on family settlement - Applicant a purchaser from one of the co-owners after judgment and decree passed by First Appellate Court but before filing of Regular Second Appeal - Basic questions involved in the suit family settlement and its effect, joint..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleading of a party - Dispute between co-sharers - Application for impleadment by purchaser of a share of one co-sharer - Neither necessary nor proper party - Has no right to challenge the factum of partition between the parties, their share and legality of the family settlement...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code-- Impleadment of party - Provisions of Order 1 Rule 10 are exception to basic principle or rule that plaintiff is dominus litus of his suit and a party objected to by him cannot be impleaded in the proceedings - Factors to be considered by Court are : (1) whether applicant necessary and proper party..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleadment in a suit for declaration - Plaintiff claiming to be owner in possession having perfected title by way of adverse possession - Applicant claiming present suit to be collusive to frustrate right of applicant in the suit filed for recovery of money which applicant forced to pay as surety..........

Showing : 51-60 of 61 Results