Showing : 411-420 of 908 Results

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 467, 468, 471-- FIR registered under - Petition for quashing FIR on ground that both parties were claiming Hibanama in their favour and civil suits were pending filed by both sides regarding Hibanama - Whether FIR filed when civil suits were pending was liable to be quashed? Yes...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 406, 420, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Conviction of accused u/s 138 NI Act - Further prosecution u/ss 406, 420 IPC is barred...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 197, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1), 13(1)(d), 19, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 467, 468, 471, 420-- Public servant - Sanction for prosecution - Sanction granted u/s 19 of Act of 1988 for offence u/s 13(1) and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act and S.420 IPC - Sanction not granted for offence u/ss 467, 468 & 471 IPC - Held, once sanction has been granted u/s 19 of 1988 Act no further..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 406, 120B, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Section 3, 4-- Quashing of FIR - (i) Delay in lodging FIR - It is an issue which is to be adjudicated upon by the trial Court; (2) Whether there is direct evidence or circumstantial evidence to prove the existence of offence u/s 120-B IPC is naturally a matter of investigation; (3) Whether the intention to cheat..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 406, 120B-- Offence u/ss 420, 406, 120-B IPC - Complainant convicted u/s 138 NI Act - Complainant alleging misuse of the same very cheque - Such a frivolous prosecution cannot be permitted to be continued - Order taking cognizance quashed...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420-- Cheating - In order to constitute an offence of cheating, the intention to deceive should be in existence at the time when the inducement was made - It is necessary to show that a person had fraudulent or dishonest intention at the time of making the promise, to say that he committed an act of..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420-- Cheating - Ingredients - (i) there should be fraudulent or dishonest inducement of a person by deceiving him, (ii)(a) the person so deceived should be induced to deliver any property to any person, or to consent that any person shall retain any property; or (b) the person so deceived should be..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B-- Order of cognizance - Quashment - No case of forgery of documents committed after document was custodia legis - S.195 Cr.P.C. wrongly applied - Impugned order set aside...........
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420-- Cheating - Quashing of proceedings - No case of complainant that petitioners tried to deceive him either by making false or misleading representation or by any other action or omission nor he was fraudulently or dishonestly induced to deliver property - Hence, no offence u/s 420 was made out -..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 274, 275, 276, 420, 120B, Trade Marks Act, 1940, Section 103, 104, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Section 17B, 27-- Bail - Offence u/ss 274, 275, 276, 420, 120-B IPC, Ss.103, 104 Trade Marks act & Ss.17-B, 27 of Drugs and Cosmetics Act - Nature and gravity of the accusation and severity of the punishment in the event of conviction are the guidelines which have to be kept in mind while granting bail...........

Showing : 411-420 of 908 Results