Showing : 5071-5080 of 13675 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 328, 307, 302-- Poisoning - If no hurt or grievous hurt is found to have been caused due to act of administering or making the victim to swallow the poison etc. is caused no offence u/s 328 IPC and for that reason under any provision like that u/ss 307 and 302 IPC is made out...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376-- Rape of married women - Statement of prosecutrix - If statement of prosecutrix inspires confidence then it can be accepted by Court and conviction can be based only on solitary evidence of prosecutrix and no corroboration would be required unless there are compelling reasons which necessitate the..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000, Section 7A, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 364A, 201, 120B, 34-- Murder - Plea of juvenility - As per Middle Standard and Matriculation certificates issued by PSEB, accused was aged 17 years 6 months and 12 days at the time of commission of offence - Accused was sentenced to life imprisonment and he is in jail for last 13 years - Held, plea of juvenility can be..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 327, 328-- Poison - Accused alleged to have offered a potato tikiyas to victim - Neither tikiyas were seized and put to test for isolating any such drug or substance or poison nor contents of stomach of appellant was analyzed to lead evidence in Court - No evidence indicating that content of tikiya was..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 366-- Abduction - Conviction set aside - Prosecutrix stayed with accused for one month - Prosecutrix and accused used to travel by rail and bus - Admitted fact that prosecutrix used to move with company of accused willingly - No hue or cry raised by prosecutrix inspite of sufficient opportunities coming..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 463, 468, 471-- Perjury - Is an obstruction of justice - Deliberately making false statements material to case, and that too under oath, amounts to crime of perjury - Any person found guilty has to be dealt seriously as it is necessary for working of Court as well as for benefit of public at large...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302-- Seven persons abducted by police - They were found in different police stations and also in residential quarters near the police station - On this evidence, Court cannot hold that the two appellants killed the seven abducted persons only because seven persons have not been traced or are found..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 195, 340, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 463, 468, 471-- Perjury - Documents filed in Court forged prior to its filing - Complaint against - Contention that complaint is not maintainable unless it is made by Court itself u/s 195 CrPC - Held, if fabrication of false evidence takes place or document is tampered with before filing in Court, provision of..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, Section 3-- Explosions and firing - Gruesome carnage resulting in death of 35 persons - Name of appellant No.2 not given in FIR - Injured witness deposing that appellant No.2 was slitting throats of deceased - However, said witness was unable to identify appellant - No other witness attributing role to..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, Section 3-- Explosions and firing - Gruesome carnage resulting in death of 35 persons - Appellants No.3 and 1 named in FIR - Injured witness deposed that both appellants were slitting throats of deceased - Both appellants were identified by eye witnesses in Court as participant in crime - Conviction of both..........

Showing : 5071-5080 of 13675 Results