Showing : 1-10 of 48 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 238, 239, 241, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 454, 380, 34-- Conviction on plea of guilt - Non-compliance of provisions of Ss.239, 240 Cr.P.C - Offence u/ss 454, 380, 34 IPC - Procedures prescribed by Ss.239, 240 Cr.P.C i.e consideration by Magistrate of police report and matter submitted before it and an opinion formed that charge should be framed, not..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 380-- Double murder - Accused having illicit relations with her cousin sister, committed murder of his cousin sister and her mother - He used to threat and blackmail her - Death occurred due to multiple injuries which were sufficient to cause death in ordinary course of nature - Time between injury and..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 380, 452, 34, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 8-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Motive - Ocular evidence of PWs 3, 4, 10 and 11 shows that A-1 had grudge against deceased because much prior to incident it was seen and heard by them that deceased used to object A-1 for his having close association with one person who was involved in carrying..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 380, 452, 34, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Last seen theory - Maruti Van carrying accused was seen moving prior to commission of offence in the area in question - Said Van recovered at the instance of A-3, as he was driver of same - Said fact is proved by two Courts below with the aid of PWs - Even..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 380, 452, 34, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Recovery and identification of stolen articles - Deceased was found dead in his shop where several articles were found missing - Said articles were recovered and got identified at the instance of accused - Recovery proved as per PWs - No explanation given by..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 380, 452, 34, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Recovery of blood stained clothes - Clothes were recovered at the instance of accused and duly proved in evidence - This equally is one of relevant circumstances in proving chain of event which led to commission of crime, which was not challenged by accused -..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 380, 452, 34, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 27-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Disclosure statement - Discovery of weapon of crime and lock and key of shop of deceased where he was found dead - Weapon of offence was discovered at the instance of A-3 and lock and key discovered at the instance of A-1, which was proved with the aid of PWs -..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 448, 341, 380, 34-- Trespass and theft - Specific allegations levelled in FIR that petitioners trespassed into portioned premises under occupation of complainant in her absence and stole goods lying there - Merely because petitioners claim that they were in possession of some portion of same premises would not mean..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 380, 381, 457, 411, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 25-- Quashing of FIR - Theft - Confession of co-accused - Petitioner named by co-accused in his disclosure statement - No recovery has been effected from petitioner - Even otherwise, confession made by accused in police custody is inadmissible in evidence in view of S.25 of Evidence Act - More so,..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 380, 34-- Murder - Accused proved to be present on the scene of crime, as finger print completely matched with specimen of accused - Although recovery happened after date provided in Malkhana Register, it does not affect the factum of seizure of shirt and other incriminating articles found with accused, as..........

Showing : 1-10 of 48 Results