Showing : 81-90 of 375 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 2(oo), 10(1)-- Termination - Award of Labour Court - Ex parte order - Petitioner/Workman given 6 effective opportunities to lead his evidence and on three occasion costs also imposed on him - He was only examined - in - chief and subsequently not appeared for cross - examination on the deferred date and his..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 10(1), 25N-- A reference under section 10(1) of the Act cannot be used to circumvent or bypass the statutory scheme provided under section 25-N of the Act...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Service-- Retrenchment - Procedural details for seeking prior permission of the appropriate government for carrying out retrenchment u/s 25-N of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 are laid down in Rule 76-A of the Industrial Disputes Central Rules - Application for permission for retrenchment is to be made in..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Service-- Retrenchment - Can only be effected by following the provisions laid down under the Act and the Rules - It is not open to the management to make a demand/proposal for retrenchment of workmen and disregarding the provisions of the Act by asking the government to refer the demand/dispute under..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 2(oo)(b)-- Retrenchment - Retirement on attaining age of superannuation - Petitioner drawn his retiral benefits - Demand notice after more than two years of his retirement on the basis of a circular claiming extension in service after attaining age of 55 years which is age of retirement - Petitioner did not..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 11A, 33(2)(b)-- Conditions of service - Punishment - During pendency of proceedings - Grant or refusal of approval under Section 33(2)(b) - Exercise of powers u/s 11 - A of the Act by the Labour Court - Labour Court ought not to have interfered with the punishment, for there was always right to challenge the..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 17B, 33(2)-- Award - Last wages drawn - The reinstatement ordered u/s 33(2) (b) is not under any award, where the validity of the termination is required to be examined in a reference u/s 10 of the Act - Application of Section 17B, for the benefits under said Section would avail only in a case where a..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 2(oo), 33(2)-- Termination - Plea that charge sheet not framed by person who was competent to do so, therefore, proceedings before the enquiry officer vitiated repelled - Held there is no single authority named under the standing orders for issuing the charge sheet and also on account of the fact that there..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 2(oo), 33(2)(b)-- Termination - Plea that the workmen's names were not found in the FIR and that the criminal Court judgment acquitted them - The criminal proceedings and the domestic enquiry operate in different fields - The judgment of a criminal court is irrelevant for any purpose except to the extent that in..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 2(oo), 33(2)-- Termination - Plea that the incident had taken place outside the factory and does not amount to misconduct in terms clause 23 - A(X) of the Standing Orders repelled - The incident had a direct linkage to the industrial discipline as co - workers had been assaulted while proceeding towards the..........

Showing : 81-90 of 375 Results