Showing : 11-20 of 41 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 154, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34-- Delayed FIR - Murder case - Offence committed at around 4-5 p.m - Registration of FIR at police station between 7.30 to 8.00 p.m. - No reason to draw adverse inference, particularly when after occurrence, deceased was taken to nearby nursing home where he was declared dead and body remained there..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 154, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34-- Delay in filing FIR - Murder - Plea that photolash and challanlash has no crime number and that FIR of incident was signed by Chief Judicial Magistrate after nine days of scribing FIR - Said plea is not sufficient to consider FIR ante-timed as case crime number is clearly mentioned in inquest..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 174, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 149-- Inquest report - Murder - Non-recording of certain relevant entries in inquest report do not constitute material defect so grave to throw out prosecution story and otherwise reliable testimonies of PWs that have mostly remained uncontroverted...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302-- Murder - Inquest report - Not necessary to mention name of accused in inquest report - However, when PW1 disclosed the name of accused in FIR and he himself was also a witness of inquest along with PW4, then natural conduct is that he should also tell the name of accused to I.O. - Such lapse..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302-- Murder - Deceased attacked by `Phawra' and neck of deceased was beheaded from the body - Eye witnesses stated that accused ran away from the scene of occurrence along with `Phawra' and head of deceased - However, PW5 Inspector stated that only `Phawra' was recovered from accused and head of..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302-- Murder in Courtroom - Inquest undertaken and body sent for postmortem even before registration of FIR - Entire prosecution case cannot be discarded as assault was made in Courtroom which called for immediate action on part of investigators to clear the Courtroom as early as possible...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 148, 201, 120B-- Murder - Non-mentioning of name of eye witness in the inquest report - Is of no consequence as inquest report relates to cause of death and not witnesses account of incident...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 326, 341, 147, 148, 149-- Murder - Unlawful assembly - Common object - Eye witnesses to the occurrence cumulatively stated the specific role played by each one of five accused - All five accused ran away from the spot after causing severe injuries to deceased and injured witnesses - Motive for offence which resulted..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302-- Murder - Inquest report - Merely because in column no.4 relating to persons who identified the dead body, name of other persons figures is no ground to create any dent in prosecution case as inquest report is prepared in presence of `H' who even signed the same - Moreover, `H' was never claimed to..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302-- Murder - Sole eye witness - PW1 does not appear to have seen the occurrence as he has not stated as to who out of two accused was having `Bogdas' (Sharp edged weapon) - Conduct of PW1 is also doubtful as he neither raised any alarm nor made any effort to save deceased although he claims himself to..........

Showing : 11-20 of 41 Results