Showing : 61-70 of 103 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Insecticides Act, 1968, Section 33-- Company - Proceedings launched against responsible person of manufacturing company without company arrayed as co-accused - Proceedings quashed - Prosecution cannot be launched against an officer of company without prosecuting the company itself...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Insecticides Act, 1968, Section 33-- Company - Proceedings launched against responsible person of manufacturing company without company arrayed as co-accused - Absence of averment in complaint that he was incharge and responsible for day-to-day business of the company - Complaint quashed...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Insecticides Act, 1968, Section 30(3)-- Sample found to be misbranded - Sample drawn from sealed container from the shop of licensed dealer - Departmental Authority restored license of dealer holding that sample was drawn from sealed container - Once license is restored by Department Authority then continuation of criminal proceedings..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Insecticides Act, 1968, Section 30(3), 3(k)(i), 17, 18-- Insecticide - Sample taken from dealer - Sample found misbranded - Container duly sealed and intact from which sample taken - Dealer has a right to seek protection u/s 30(3) of the Act - Proceedings against dealer quashed...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Insecticides Act, 1968, Section 3(k)(1)-- Insecticide - Sample found to be misbranded - Sanction for prosecution of Manufacturing company through its Managing Director granted - It is sanction for prosecution of Company and not of Managing Director - Prosecution against Managing Director quashed...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Insecticides Act, 1968, Section 31(1), 3k(1), 17-- Insecticide - Sample found to be misbranded - Prosecution of Managing Director and Chemist of company - Sanction for prosecution granted against Company through its Managing Director - Sanction for prosecution of Managing Director and Chemist in their individual capacity not obtained - Moreover in..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Insecticides Act, 1968, Section 30(3)-- Insecticide - Sample found misbranded - License of dealer cancelled - Departmental Appellate Authority Restored the license of the dealer and held that the sample was drawn out of sealed container - When sample taken from sealed container is found to be misbranded by analyst and departmental..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Insecticides Act, 1968, Section 3(k)(1)-- Insecticide - Misbranded - Partnership firm - Sanction to prosecute partnership firm given without giving the names of partners to be prosecuted - When name of persons belonging to the firm who are to be prosecuted is not given then proceedings launched against proprietor of the firm or other..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Insecticides Act, 1968, Section 3(k)(1), 17, 18, 29-- Insecticide - Misbranded - Sample taken in a packed and sealed condition as supplied by manufacturer - Petitioner who is a dealer, cannot be held liable...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Insecticides Act, 1968, Section 24-- Insecticide - Sample found misbranded - Accused summoned when shelf life had already expired - Accused thus lost his valuable right u/s 24 of the Act - Conviction set aside...........

Showing : 61-70 of 103 Results