Showing : 1-10 of 74 Results

PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 96-- Insurance claim - Delay in payment - Claim was filed by plaintiff in the year 1972 - Defendant/appellants have still not paid the amount to plaintiff - No case made out by defendant that doctor examined on behalf of plaintiff had given a wrong report - Age of deceased also supported by..........
PUNJAB CHANDIGARH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Insurance claim-- Repudiation - Suppression of material fact - At the time of revival of insurance policy the insured concealed the material fact of his being suffering from heart disease for which he had been taking treatment for the last five years - The repudiation of claim held to be legal and valid - Impugned..........
H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Insurance Act, 1938, Section 45, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 13(4)-- Insurance claim - Repudiation - Suppression of material fact - Adverse inference - Ailment of gall bladder and CRD stones which has no nexus with death of insured due to breast cancer - Specific averment by complainant that ailment disclosed to the agent by the policy holder but agent told that..........
HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Insurance claim-- Repudiation - Suppression of material fact - At the time of revival of policy in the proposal form life assured had not disclosed that he was suffering from Rheumatic Heart Disease - Appellant - OP was justified in repudiating the claim - District Forum passed the impugned order allowing the claim..........
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Insurance claim-- Repudiation - Suppression of material fact - At the time of revival of policy in the proposal form life assured had not disclosed that he was suffering from Rheumatic Heart Disease - Appellant - OP was justified in repudiating the claim - District Forum passed the impugned order allowing the claim..........
HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Insurance claim-- Repudiation - Suppression of material fact - At the time of revival of policy in the proposal form life assured had not disclosed that he was suffering from lungs carcinoma with pulmonary T.B. - Appellant - OP was justified in repudiating the claim - District Forum passed the impugned order..........
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Insurance claim-- Repudiation - Suppression of material fact - At the time of revival of policy in the proposal form life assured had not disclosed that he was suffering from lungs carcinoma with pulmonary T.B. - Appellant - OP was justified in repudiating the claim - District Forum passed the impugned order..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), 21(b)-- Revisional jurisdiction - Concurrent findings - Medi - claim policy - Pre - existing disease - Suppression of material fact - There is a gap of 35 days in issuance of policy for the fourth year, which have been treated fresh policy for the risk period 6.8.1997 to 5.8.1998 - As per record, Coronary..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), 21(b)-- Revisional jurisdiction - Concurrent findings - Medi - claim policy - Pre - existing disease - Suppression of material fact - There is a gap of 35 days in issuance of policy for the fourth year, which have been treated fresh policy for the risk period 6.8.1997 to 5.8.1998 - As per record, Coronary..........
UTTARAKHAND STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, DEHRADUN
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Mediclaim policy-- Insurance claim - Repudiation - Suppression of material fact - There is no iota of evidence on record to prove that the complainant had any kind of knowledge with regard to the ailment with which he suffered in the year 2004, i.e. after about 9 months of taking the mediclaim policy - It cannot be..........

Showing : 1-10 of 74 Results