Showing : 81-90 of 357 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Section 18(1)-Second Proviso and 17 - Appeal against order of Debts Recovery Tribunal - Requirement of pre deposit as stipulated u/s 18 (1) of the Act - Appellate Tribunal had exempted appellant from making any deposit in terms of second Proviso to S.18 of the Act before entertaining appeal - Matter remitted back..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Section 18(1)-Second Proviso and 17 - Appeal against order of Debts Recovery Tribunal - Pre condition of deposit as envisaged under 2nd proviso to S.18(1)A of the Act - Held, condition of pre deposit being mandatory, complete waiver of deposit by appellate Tribunal not permissible under provisions of Act -..........
THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 14(1)(d)-- Housing - Plot allotment - Deficiency in service - Unfair trade practice - Compensation - OPs are not willing to give possession of the allotted plot to the complainant even in spite of having collected a huge amount from him contending that the same allotted to some other person - Allotment once..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 118-- Dishonour of cheque - Cheque issued towards interest of the amount in question - Present opponent No.2-accused proved his case - Prosecution has failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt the ingredient of S.138 of NI Act - There are serious lacuna in oral as well as documentary evidence of..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Interest Act, 1978, Section 3-- Illegal withholding the amount - Interest cannot be awarded as damages - However, since plaintiff had given a notice demanding amount with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date the amount became due and payable to the plaintiff as such in the circumstances interest at the rate of 6%..........
MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI, CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 14(1)(d)-- Deficiency in service - Unfair trade practice - Compensation - Digital Solvent printer - Appellants supplied printer of model No. 1800E instead of model No. 1830S as ordered by the respondent - Complainant time to time informed appellants about the delivery and installation of different make..........
KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BANGALORE
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d)-- Housing - Flat booking - Deficiency in service - Refund - Compensation - Interest - Agreement came to be executed between the parties on 4.4.2007 - As per the terms of the agreement OPs are liable to construct and handover the possession by executing the sale deed within a period of 24 months from..........
KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BANGALORE
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Housing-- Villa booking - Deficiency in service - Non handing over possession - Refund - Complaint deposited a sum of Rs. 31.56,098/ - with OPs and agreement executed between the parties on 4.4.2007 - Plan got approved by the OP during January, 2009 - Even after lapse of several months OPs could not get the..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 18-- Recovery of 2 Kg. of opium - Independent witness joined but not examined as being won over - Official witnesses are as good as private witnesses and their testimony cannot be thrown away merely on the ground of their official status - They cannot be dubbed as interested witnesses without any..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 3, 33, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376, 328, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Offence u/ss 376/328 IPC and Ss.3/33 SCST Act - Prosecutrix and accused were under 18 years of age at the time of commission of offence - Matter compromised between parties in presence of respectables of the village and relatives of both the parties - Quashing at the instance of victim herself who..........

Showing : 81-90 of 357 Results