Showing : 1-10 of 78 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 2A-- Interim injunction order - Disobedience - Defendant restrained from raising construction - Respondent No.2 raising construction on behalf of defendant - Respondent No.2 not a party in the suit - Not established on record that he was working on behalf of defendant - Injunction order was not passed..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151-- Interim maintenance - Claimed by plaintiff and his family - Suit for partition and separate possession - Plaintiff failed to prove prima facie case regarding his entitlement of his share in suit properties - He thus, not entitled to any interim maintenance - Application for interim maintenance..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 43, Rule 1(r), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Appeal - Interim order, restraining defendant from interfering or doing any illegal activities in relation to suit property granted during pendency of application for temporary injunction without recording reasons - Order is interlocutory order and not temporary injunction order - Such order is..........
TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Grant of police aid - Implementation of ad-interim injunction order - Defendants already filed their written statement as well as counter in application U.O.39.Rr.1, 2 CPC and they are always ready for enquiry - Besides in the written statement a copy of which is filed along with material papers,..........
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Temporary injunction - Restraining defendants and their men, agents, associates from causing any obstruction/disturbances or interference in free ingress and egress of plaintiff and their vehicles in suit property - Disputed gate and passage over which plaintiff is claiming some reliefs are..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 2A-- Disobedience of interim order of status quo - Defendants being in possession of suit land, already completed repairing works over suit land by the time order of status quo was received - Plaintiffs failed to establish that there is willful and deliberate violation of status quo order by defendants..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Ad-interim mandatory injunction - Against defendants for unlocking suit premises - Plaintiff purchased suit property 6 months prior to institution of suit in auction conducted by Bank under SARFAESI Act - He is also in possession of suit property, constituted undisputed and uncontested status..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 2A-- Application U.O.39.R.2-A CPC - Forum to move an application - Court where main proceeding is pending deals with an application U.O.39.R.2-A CPC - Similarly, appellate Court (if the appeal suit is pending on its file) shall deal with an application alleging violation of injunction in respect of an..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 6, Rule 17-- Amendment of plaint - Relief of mandatory injunction sought on the ground that defendant started raising construction during pendency of suit and in violation of interim orders - Issue regarding entitlement of plaintiff to the decree for mandatory injunction already framed - Moreover, plaintiff..........
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 5, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Stay of injunction order - Ad interim injunction order was passed against subsequent purchaser/applicant, as defendant/vendor sold the agreed property to him - It is evident that applicant would be parting with right, title and possession of a part of suit property by creating third party..........

Showing : 1-10 of 78 Results