Showing : 11-20 of 78 Results

TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Ad interim injunction - Restraining appellant from interfering peaceful possession and enjoyment of `A' schedule property - Plaintiff failed to show any semblance of evidence that he is in possession of `A' schedule property - Even on the contrary, plaintiff suffered adverse findings in this..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Ad interim Injunction - Ancestral property - Inheritance prima facie is from a direct male ancestor exceeding three degrees higher than themselves - Plaintiffs only intend that defendant should not alienate, encumber, transfer or change the nature of suit property in any manner during pendency of..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 2A-- Disobedience of interim injunction order - Where a party is accused of flouting or disobeying interim orders and proceedings have initiated during pendency of suit/appeal, as the case may be, subsequent dismissal of application, suit, appeal or even withdrawal of same would have no consequence in..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1-- Ad-interim injunction - Plaintiff expanded unauthorized construction on the suit property in violation of status quo order - Photographs produced by Municipal Corporation regarding unauthorized construction proved on record - Plaintiff is not entitled to equitable relief, as such relief can only..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Ad-interim injunction - Restraining defendant to lay water pipes through the suit land along with pucca path - Pucca path passes through suit land and being used by defendant and villagers, which is constructed by Panchayat - It also leads to the house of defendant - Plaintiff failed to produce..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Interim injunction - Since the letter of administration did not vest any absolute legal title in applicant Nos. 1 & 2 to sell the disputed property, Court below while exercising its power u/s 151 CPC rightly injuncted applicants from creating third party rights in respect of suit property and..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 2A, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11-- Violation of ad interim injunction - Application U.O.39.R.2-A for implementation of order of injunction and compensation for suffering damages of Rs.72 lacs, by attaching and selling property - Application in no way can be treated as suit for damages - No Court fee can be ordered on application on..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Interim injunction - Plaintiff, an employee provided accommodation during course of employment - After retirement plaintiff continued in possession of such premises - Plea that plaintiff constructed house from his own resources, as such he is owner of suit property - Plaintiff failed to prove that..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2, 3-- Ex parte ad interim injunction - Suit for partition - Defendants were negotiating to sell the property in dispute and change the nature of land by raising construction - There was an urgency in the matter as nature of property in suit is required to be maintained - In case any construction is..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 148A-- Caveat - A caveat is merely an advance intimation by the defendant communicated to the prospective plaintiff and registered in the court, where defendant expects the suit to be filed - A caveat is merely an anticipatory application to ensure that no ex parte interim order is granted to such..........

Showing : 11-20 of 78 Results