Showing : 1-10 of 15 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34-- Murder - Parole - Mere fact that a person is convicted for an offence does not mean that he will abscond if he is released on parole...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34-- Murder - Parole for the purpose of house repair - Possibility of petitioner absconding or involving in other serious crime while released on parole, is just apprehension in the mind of authority, which is not based on any substantial evidence or reasoning - Moreover, on earlier occasion also..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376, 506-- Rape - Reduction of sentence - Accused 24 years of age at the time of commission of offence and has no other case against him - Sentence imposed is life imprisonment and not to be released from jail till death - Sentence appears to be on higher side - Sentence reduced to 15 years actual custody..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988, Section 3(1)(d)-- House Repair Parole - Petitioner convicted and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 10 years u/ss 376, 377 and 526 IPC - Petitioner applied for house repair parole - Commissioner declined the same - House in a good condition - House of the victim party was in neighbour of the petitioner's house - Due to..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988, Section 3(1)(d)-- Petitioner convicted u/s 302, 307, 323 r/w Ss.148 and 149 IPC and sentenced for life imprisonment - Release on parole sought on ground of repair of house - Prayer rejected on the ground that petitioner already availed 6 weeks agricultural parole - 6 months expired since he returned from earlier..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988, Section 3(1)(c)-- Agricultural Parole - Conviction u/s 302 IPC - Application for agriculture parole rejected by Divisional Commissioner on the ground that there is enmity in the family of convict and he may commit any crime in the village after coming on parole - Petitioner is neither a habitual offender nor a..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 201, 34, Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988, Section 4-- Furlough - Release on furlough declined merely on the ground that petitioner had already availed parole - No other reason given for rejecting release on furlough - Impugned order shows that convict has availed parole recently and hence her parole case is filed - It was not a parole case, which is..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988, Section 3(1)(d)-- Accused convicted u/ss 392 and 397 IPC read with S.25 of Arms Act - Accused sought parole on the ground that wife is pregnant and her delivery date is very near - Accused already availed parole twice in the same year - He returned from parole one month ago knowing fully well the pregnancy of wife..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988, Section 3(1)(c), 6, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302-- Parole - Petitioner was convicted and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment u/s 302 IPC - Petition for grant of agricultural parole for six weeks u/s 3(1)(c) - Commissioner held that convict may commit any heinous crime on arrival on parole - No land in the name of petitioner - No land in..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958, Rule 9, 14-- Conviction u/ss 395/396 IPC - One fourth of sentence undergone - Parole sought to look after ailing wife - Parole not recommended by S.P. and Advisory Committee - Vigour of Rule is set off if a person has already undergone one fourth of the sentence including remission - Parole for 20 days granted..........

Showing : 1-10 of 15 Results