Showing : 1421-1430 of 13784 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 467, 468, 471, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(2)-- Bail - Cheating - Forgery - Allegation against accused are regarding forgery etc. and his stamp vending licence was cancelled by State - No other offence against petitioner - There is thus, no point in continuing detention of accused as under trial for facing trial - Moreover, co-accused has also..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 406, 120B-- Quashing of FIR - Cheating - Wrong entries in the mutation record - Mutation entries are fiscal entries and do not create any right in the property - Criminal prosecution for the same amounts to abuse of process of law - FIR quashed - Petition allowed...........
UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, Section 7, 25-- Custody of child - Conviction of father u/ss 420, 467, 468 IPC on the ground that he obtained appointment on the basis of fraudulent domicile certificate, cannot be borrowed to make it as basis to reject application for custody of child - Such type of offence may be a social offence, but it will..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376(2)(g), 354, 384, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 3(1)(xi), 3(2)(v), Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Section 3, 4, 11, 12-- Bail - Rape - Prosecutrix totally gave up allegations levelled against co-accused and was declared hostile - She made farfetched and uncorroborated allegations against accused - Benefit of bail granted to accused - Application allowed...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 392-- Robbery of vehicle - Delay of one week in lodging FIR not explained by complainant - Owner of vehicle not produced as a witness to establish fact that complainant informed him about vehicle being hired - Fact from where complainant was robbed was known to police and thus there was no discovery in..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 471, 201-- Offence u/ss 471, 201 IPC - Four persons were sitting in the vehicle in question having fake number plate - Trial Court acquitted three co-accused except accused - Case of accused cannot be distinguished from other co-accused - Moreover, accused was not driving the vehicle and he was merely a..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 156(3), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 379, 420, 406, 417, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120B-- Direction for registration of FIR - FIR u/ss 379, 420, 406, 417, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC - DDR for loss of document including signed cheques were registered in 2007 by husband of complainant - Whereas cheque in question was issued in 2009, i.e. more than 2 years after said DDR, coupled with..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 190, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 367-- Cognizance of offence - As per FIR and statement of complainant, grievous hurt was caused at the time of kidnapping - Moreover, once prosecution has accepted that accused has committed offence of causing grievous hurt and kidnapping than ingredients of S.367 IPC are fulfilled - Order of Magistrate..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 423, 464, 471, 447, 427, 120B-- Quashing of FIR - Agreement to sell - Not honoured - FIR used only as a mode to execute the agreement in question - On the face of it, FIR does not constitute the offence u/ss 120-B, 418, 420, 423, 464, 471, 447 & 427 IPC - FIR with all consequential proceedings, quashed...........
MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 177, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 498A, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Section 4-- Territorial jurisdiction - Dowry demand - Wife was forced to leave her matrimonial home at `M' - Wife returned back to her parental home in `S' and filed complaint there - Since, consequence of offence which was committed at `M' occurred at `S', therefore, Court at `S' will have jurisdiction to..........

Showing : 1421-1430 of 13784 Results