Showing : 101-110 of 390 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 201-- Murder of daughter by father by administering poison - However, doctor opined that death occurred on account of head injury - It was not even remotely the case of prosecution that accused is in any way responsible for head injury suffered by deceased - Moreover, PW12, wife of accused, who..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 201, 120B, 34-- Bail - Murder - Complicity of petitioner based on circumstantial evidence - Evidence collected against petitioner is a confessional statement made by co-accused - Admissibility of such confessional statement in evidence would be yet another issue - Offence if at all made out is a moot question -..........
TRIPURA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 227, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 201, 34-- Discharge of accused at the stage of framing charge - There is strong suspicion against involvement of accused in the crime - To discharge the accused at this stage on the available materials on record would amount to shutting the case of prosecution, which is yet to examine its witnesses -..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364, 302, 201, 34, 120B, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 27-- Kidnapping - Murder - Recovery panchnama - Admissibility - Merely in absence of signatures of accused on recovery memo/panchnama will not make it inadmissible in evidence...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364, 302, 201, 34, 120B, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 27-- Kidnapping - Murder - Discovery of fact - There is no evidence on record regarding blood group or fact that blood stains belonged to blood group of deceased - Even, recovery itself is doubtful - Therefore, merely in absence of evidence regarding blood group will not make case of prosecution fatal..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364, 302, 201, 34, 120B-- Kidnapping - Murder - Criminal conspiracy - Admittedly, accused No.3 was present at relevant time in house of accused No.1 - Even, accused No.3 was also seen while loading gunny bag in vehicle and thereafter, he was also travelling in said vehicle - Therefore, prosecution leaves no doubt about..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364, 302, 201, 34, 120B, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 8-- Kidnapping - Murder - Motive - There is no documentary evidence with regard to land transaction between deceased and accused which is established by unshattered corroborated oral evidence - Therefore, absence of documentary evidence cannot discard motive proved by oral evidence...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364, 302, 201, 34, 120B, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3-- Kidnapping - Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Last seen together - As per prosecution witnesses, deceased left house after telephonic call of accused and thereafter, he withdrew cash from bank and proceeded to house of accused - Even, accused were seen loading gunny bag in vehicle used for..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364, 302, 201, 34, 120B, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 27-- Kidnapping - Murder - Discovery of fact - Dead body of deceased recovered from valley on basis of disclosure statement of two accused persons - Therefore, disclosure statement made by them separately in quick succession to I.O., preceding discovery of fact so stated, is admissible in evidence..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 148, 149, 201, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 27-- Double murder - Disclosure statement - Recovery of ashes and bones - Merely because no expert opinion obtained to prove as to whether bones recovered were human or animal bones, would not weaken the prosecution case in the light of overwhelming evidence available on record to prove the complicity..........

Showing : 101-110 of 390 Results