Showing : 181-190 of 371 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364, 392, 302, 201-- Abduction - Robbery - Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Last seen evidence - Skeleton of deceased recovered at the instance of accused after 12 days of taking away of deceased - No proximity of time between last seen and recovery of skeleton or dead body - It is improbable that in presence of PW1..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364, 392, 302, 201-- Abduction - Robbery - Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Confession as to recovery of skelton of deceased - Accused made his confession while he was in police custody - No reliance can be placed on confessional statement of accused except recovery - Though facts leading to recovery is admissible..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364, 392, 302, 201-- Abduction - Robbery - Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Recovery of skeleton of deceased - Though skeleton was recovered at the instance of accused in view of his confessional statement but skeleton was not connected with deceased - More so, skeleton not sent to FSL for determination of time and..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 201-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Accused acquitted on the basis of apparent lapses in the investigation and missing links on the following grounds: (i) Non-recovery of stolen money and weapon of offence; (ii) False case lodged by PW2 alleging he was looted by some other miscreants; (iii)..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 201-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Last seen theory - Time gap between deceased last seen with accused persons and recovery of his body is long - No definite evidence that deceased and accused were last seen together - No other piece of evidence to corroborating last seen theory - It would be..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 201-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Motive - Prosecution alleged that motive of crime is lust of money which was carried by deceased - But no money was recovered from accused persons - However, after investigation it was discovered that false case was registered by PW2 that he was being robbed by..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 392, 328, 201, 473, 420, 34-- Taxi hired by accused persons to visitvarious temples - Body of deceased taxi owner found after 10 days - Prosecution duly proved that vehicle was hired by accused - Recovery of vehicle and registration of vehicle duly proved - Recovery of knife, rod, rope and30 tablets of lorazepam from vehicle..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 201, 34-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Mother of deceased stated that before the murder deceased left the house being telephonically called by accused - However, there is no call details on record establishing this fact - Prosecution instead of making investigation adequately relied upon the fact..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 201, 34, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 228-- Charge framed u/ss 302, 498-A IPC - Accused cannot be convicted for offences punishable u/s 201, 34 IPC...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364A, 302, 34, 120B, 201-- Kidnapping for ransom - Murder - Last seen evidence - Deceased was last seen alive in the company of accused Nos.5 & 3 - It is for the accused to explain how and when they parted company of deceased - No explanation is forthcoming from accused which is a strong militating circumstance against them..........

Showing : 181-190 of 371 Results