Showing : 1-10 of 28 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 304(Part I), 324, 149, Explosive Substances Act, 1908, Section 3, 4, 5-- Offence u/ss 304(Part I), 324, 149 IPC - Bomb blast - Injuries sustained by accused persons were duly explained by prosecution - Pellet injuries as sustained by A-3 were as a result of explosion of bomb which was handed by A-2 - As a result of incident, two deceased died and six persons were..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 304(Part II), 324, 341, 147, 148, 149-- Offence u/ss 304(Part II), 324, 341, 147, 148, 149 IPC - Fifteen named accused and some unnamed accused were mentioned in complaint itself - However, no motive alleged in the complaint - No independent witnesses examined apart from injured witnesses to prove prosecution case - Even injured..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 304(Part II), 324, 353, 379, 411, 34-- Offence u/ss 304 Part-II, 324, 353, 379, 411, 34 IPC - Identification of accused - Accused persons identified in Court for the first time after a gap of more than 2 years from the date of incident - Incident occurred in the night, at a place with improper lighting - Accused persons not known to..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 304(Part II), 324, 353, 379, 411, 34-- Offence u/ss 304 Part-II, 324, 353, 379, 411, 34 IPC - Delay of 8 days by investigating agency to make arrest of all accused - Plea that accused were absconding, rejected, as if they were really absconding then they should remain absconding - Arrest of accused from home casts a shadow of doubt on..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 304(Part II), 324, 353, 379, 411, 34-- Offence u/ss 304 Part-II, 324, 353, 379, 411, 34 IPC - Material contradictions in the prosecution story - Accused acquitted viz. : (i) FIR lodged against four unknown persons, despite the fact that complainant knew the name of one of accused; (ii) Forest officers including driver of jeep ten in..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 148, 149, 307, 323, 324, 326, 427, 447-- Murder - Unlawful assembly - Common object - Primary intention of unlawful assembly was to dispossess complainant party - Appellants aim was to assault PW1 and when deceased and others intervened, fatal injuries caused to deceased - Deceased died after 11 days - Eye witness support prosecution..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Explosive Substances Act, 1908, Section 7,3,4,5,6, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 285,286,323,324,304-- IPC - Offence u/ss 3 to 6 Explosives Act and ,Ss. 285, 286, 323, 324 and 304 - Accused discharged for want of sanction of authority - Sanction obtained after three years - Three years period cannot be termed as delay in the facts of the case, where 14 innocent persons lost their lives and..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 148, 149, 324, 304-- Part-I - Accused having formed themselves into an unlawful assembly, being armed with deadly weapons, caused hurt to `K' and assaulted `S' (deceased) who succumbed to his injuries - Evidence of `K' found credible - Mere fact that `K' did not mention the names of all the accused is no reason to..........
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 304, 324 323, 34-- Culpable homicide or voluntarily causing hurt - Accused who were cutting crops claim to be their's and wanted to remove the crop by force - Assaulted deceased with tangi and lathi - Medical evidence showing two fatal injuries on the head of deceased were given by appellant No.1 and 2 - Conviction..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 324, 307, 304(Part II), Arms Act, 1959, Section 25-- Acquittal by trial Court - Conviction by High Court - High Court discarded the important pieces of evidence on the basis of surmises and conjectures - Testimony of an eye witness does not support the testimony of injured witnesses on material and vital aspects - These discrepancies are vital for..........

Showing : 1-10 of 28 Results