Showing : 101-110 of 136 Results

ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 341, 294-- Cognizance of offence by Magistrate u/ss 341 and 294 of IPC on a complaint - Alleged occurrence took place on 1.9.2002 - Complaint filed on 10.6.2004 - Period of limitation prescribed u/s 468 (2) Cr.P.C. is period of one year from the date of occurrence - Held, time barred cognizance bad in law -..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 173, 190-- Rejection of protest petition - Complainant filed FIR against accused for offences u/ss 341, 352, 504 IPC - After investigation, final report submitted by police - Complainant filed protest petition against final report - Magistrate by critically analyzing the evidence collected by the..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Constitution of India, 1950, Article 19(1)(a), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 506, 341, 323, 148, 149, 120B-- Accused facing trial in a criminal case sought permission to go abroad on the ground that her daughter was residing in America and in order to get her visa extended, it is necessary for her to visit that country and stay there for three months - Permission refused - Held, right to go abroad is..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 300-- Murder - Accused came on spot armed with weapons and surrounded deceased persons and assaulted them - No specific allegation by any of witnesses for inflicting any specific injury against co-accused - On basis of material on record only physical participation of co-accused in occurrence found -..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 341, 302, 307, 34-- Bail - Offence u/ss 341, 302, 307 read with S.34 IPC - Two other co-accused granted bail - Prima facie material against the petitioner - Quarrel ensued between deceased and petitioner at the first instance and thereafter petitioner with other co-accused caused assault - Interfering with the..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 438, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 323, 341, 148, 149, 120B-- Anticipatory bail - Offence u/ss 302, 323, 341, 148, 149, 120-B IPC - Accusations levelled against the petitioner do not seem to be false, baseless and groundless - Petitioner avoiding arrest with connivance of police - Petitioner not entitled to bail...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 320, 482-- Offence u/ss 447, 427, 341, 336, 323, 323/34, 325, 325/34 IPC - Composition of offence allowed except offence u/s 336 IPC - No use continuing proceedings after parties compromised - Proceedings quashed...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 341, 307, 34-- Acquittal by trial Court - Conviction by High Court - FIR promptly lodged - Copy of FIR forwarded to Magistrate without delay - Evidence of PW1 relating to attack on deceased corroborated by documentary evidence and oral testimony of PWs.4, 11, 2 & 3 - PW3 independent witness and her house located..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 307, 149, 148, 341-- Death of D1 and D2 homicidal - Grave and serious injuries to PW1 - Evidence of doctor clear, categorical and unambiguous that PW1 was in a fit condition to give statement - Statement of PW1 recorded by PW11 in presence of doctor wherein he gave detailed version of incident - His testimony..........
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 438, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 341, 323, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 3, 4, 18-- Anticipatory bail - Informant belongs to Scheduled Caste - Allegation leveled by informant that it were only petitioners `B' and `U' who had insulted and intimidated by calling her "Dusadhin" outside their houses and it was specifically alleged that petitioner `U' had thrashed her by holding her..........

Showing : 101-110 of 136 Results