Showing : 1-10 of 120 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 363, 366, 376D, 342, 120B-- Kidnapping and rape - Prosecutrix was running about more than 18 years of her age at the time of incident - It is not clear by prosecutrix how she came in company of accused and how accused branded a knife on her in order to abduct her - Prosecutrix stated that she was kept confined in a Jhuggi..........
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Section 6, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 342-- -Penetrative sexual assault - When version of victim and her mother with regard to penetrative sexual assault receives corroboration from medical evidence, no, examination of independent witness, if any does not affect credibility of prosecution case...........
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Section 6, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 342-- Penetrative sexual assault - Insertion of finger in vagina of a three years old girl which is supported by medical evidence leaves no manner of doubt that ingredients of offence u/s 5 of POCSO Act are fully established - Complete penetration is not sine quo non for offence of rape or penetrative..........
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 357A, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Section 6, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 342-- Compensation - Penetrative sexual assault - Victim was three years old at the time of incident - Accused brutally penetrated minor victim with his finger resulting in severe injuries in her private parts - State directed to pay compensation to the tune of Rs.5 lakhs to minor victim in public realm..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 438-- Anticipatory bail - Offence u/ss 376, 342, 406 IPC and S.3 of SC & ST Act - Allegations and counter allegations is a debatable issue arising over the fact whether prosecution has been set up as counter blast to proceedings initiated u/s 138 NI Act which could only be adjudicated at the time of..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 342, 323, 147, 148, 149-- Murder - Eye witness/PW2 not named any of accused in FIR whereas, in his statement in Court, names of accused did occur in his testimony - However, PW2 did not attribute any overt act to accused - Other eye witnesses also did not name any of accused - Evidence of PW4 though indicate some role but..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376, 323, 342, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 9-- Rape of 7 years old girl - Test Identification Parade (TIP) - Photograph of accused shown to prosecutrix by her father before TIP - Prosecutrix in her examinatio, i, chief not disclosed name of accused and even his physical appearance - She however, identified accused in Court - TIP cannot be..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376, 323, 342-- Rape of 7 years old girl - FIR does not give description of accused either in form of age or physique - Though accused was seen running from scene of occurrence holding his pant by PW1/father of prosecutrix, but he could not see face of person who ran after commission of offence - Even in..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 156, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 342, 376, 506-- Defective investigation - Final report in favour of accused - Offence u/ss 342, 376, 506 IPC - Serious allegations and imputations against accused were made by victim in her statement recorded u/s 164 Cr.P.C - Slight variation in statement of victim and/or S.161 or S.164 Cr.P.C cannot be stifled..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 498A, 342, 323, 506, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 177-- Demand of dowry - Jurisdiction - Accused residents of place `J' and marriage was solemnized at place `J' - Allegation in FIR that demand and acceptance of dowry was at place `B' - Held, Court at place `B' has jurisdiction...........

Showing : 1-10 of 120 Results