Showing : 11-20 of 389 Results

PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 366A-- Kidnapping of two minor girls - No eye witness in the case except victim girls - No evidence on record that both the girls were induced with intent that they may be forced or seduced to have illicit intercourse with any person - They have not raised any objection at any point of time while..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 363, 366, 376-- Kidnapping and rape - Prosecutrix remained in the company of accused for about 12 days until she was recovered - Prosecutrix freely moved with accused in course of which movement, she came across many people at different points but she did not complain of any criminal act on part of accused -..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 363, 366, 376-- Kidnapping and rape - Determination of age of prosecutrix - Age of prosecutrix not determined as per documents produced on record - Radiological age of prosecutrix determined between 17 to 18 years - Though it is correct that age determined on basis of a radiological examination may not be..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 363, 366-- Kidnapping - Conviction - Parties subsequently compromised - Complainant married to another person and they are living happily and they have no complaint against accused - Sentence of accused thus, modified to the period already undergone by him - However, accused shall pay a fine of Rs.2 lakhs...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 363, 366, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Section 17, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Offence u/ss 363, 366 IPC and S.17 of POCSO Act - Quashing of FIR - Prosecutrix found major by Doctors who conducted her ossification test as per order of Court - Medical report of prosecutrix is based on complete physical examination of prosecutrix - Prosecutrix since is adult and she had gone..........
UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 366, 363, 376, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Section 3, 4-- Kidnapping and rape - Quashing of proceedings - Though on the basis of statement by prosecutrix and her mother, possibility of accused being acquitted cannot be ruled out - But at the same time, possibility of conviction can also not be ruled out as trial is still on and further evidence is to be..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 363, 366, 120B-- Kidnapping - Accused solemnized marriage with prosecutrix and both were major at the time of marriage - Prosecutrix herself stated that she has gone of her own and she is not seduced by anybody - Prosecutrix even stated that her father lodged false FIR - Ossification test assure that prosecutrix..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 366, 376, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Section 4-- Kidnapping and rape of minor girl by juvenile - Sole testimony of prosecutrix - Testimonies of parents of prosecutrix are hearsay - Contradictory statement was given by prosecutrix - Medical evidence also belies the story propounded by PWs, as marks of resistance on the body of prosecutrix were..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 438, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 366, 376, 506-- Anticipatory bail - Kidnapping and rape - FIR filed as counter blast to complaint made by petitioner against some police officials - There was dispute between petitioner and complainant with regard to dishonour of certain cheques to which petitioner filed complaint u/s 138 of N.I Act against..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 366-- Abduction - Evidence on record shows that complainant and accused were in relationship which was known to their families also - Primary allegation is that accused took complainant forcibly to his house - But it was not with intent to seduce her to illicit intercourse - Statement of being molested..........

Showing : 11-20 of 389 Results