Showing : 1-10 of 144 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 394, 411, 34, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 32-- Murder - Dying declaration - Version of facts stated in dying declaration are in enormous conflict with facts stated by eye witness and also location shown in site plan - Out of four eye witnesses cited by prosecution, three did not support prosecution story - Three independent witnesses produced..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376D, 377, 394-- Rape of married woman - Statement of prosecutrix is duly corroborated by medical evidence - Prosecutrix had suffered injuries on her cheeks, private part, thighs and back - There was swelling in vagina of prosecutrix - Offence was promptly reported to police - Prosecutrix was medically examined on..........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 394, 397, 34, Arms Act, 1959, Section 25(1)(B)(A)-- Murder - Robbery - Handwritten letter which alleged to be given to deceased by accused was seized and same was proved to be written by accused as per handwriting expert - Question with regard to alleged letter was put to accused during their statement u/s 313 Cr.P.C but except vague denial they..........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 118, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 394, 397, 34, Arms Act, 1959, Section 25(1)(B)(A)-- Solitary testimony of a child witness - Murder - Robbery - Child witness is 10 years old at the time of incident - He specifically and categorically stated as to how incident took place and manner in which A-1 opened gunshot on his father/deceased resulting in his death - Statement of child..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 394-- Murder - Robbery - Motive - Prosecution failed to prove motive attributed to accused - Accused was frequent visitor to house of deceased - He never raised any dispute with deceased in presence of PW1 - Case of prosecution is that accused was demanding Rs.10,000 for simple reason that he had to..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 323, 365, 452, 376D, 394-- Bail - Offence u/ss 323, 365, 452, 376-D, 394 - Neither there is specific allegation against petitioner nor his name finds mention in FIR - Even, statement of complainant u/ss 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. is self contradictory - Moreover, co-accused has already been granted bail - Fit case to grant bail as..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 394, 34-- Murder and robbery - Circumstantial evidence - Last seen evidence - Prosecution relied upon evidence of PW8 to show that accused and victims were last seen together - However, PW8 in her evidence stated that accused had come one day before in night and next day deceased persons died - PW8 is a..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 394, 34, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 8-- Murder and robbery - Circumstantial evidence - Motive - Prosecution alleged that robbery as motive of crime - However, site plan panchnama shows that expensive ornaments like gold, pearl necklace etc. were left behind on person of deceased - No explanation as to why accused would intend to commit..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 27, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 394, 34-- Recovery of shirt of accused - Murder and robbery - Mere recovery of shirt of accused at his instance allegedly matched with small broken button found at the scene of crime, would not prove the guilt of accused, particularly when nothing in record to show that shirt is unique and cannot be matched..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 27, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 394, 34-- Recovery of motorcycle - Murder and robbery - No evidence on record that motorcycle recovered at the instance of accused belongs to him - Even no attempt made by I.O to enquire about owner of vehicle - PW2, was the witness of seizure of motorcycle - According to him motorcycle was red in color -..........

Showing : 1-10 of 144 Results