Showing : 1-10 of 116 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 394, 449, 34, Arms Act, 1959, Section 25, 27-- Tripple murder case - Robbery - Delay in arrest of accused despite clear knowledge of whereabouts of accused casts a serious shadow of doubt over prosecution case...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 394, 449, 34, Arms Act, 1959, Section 25, 27-- Tripple murder case - Robbery - Circumstantial evidence - Identification of recovered ornaments - Prosecution examined many witnesses who are alleged to be pledgors of ornaments - Identification procedure was conducted without mixing recovered jewellery with similar or identical ornaments -..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 394, 449, 34, Arms Act, 1959, Section 25, 27-- Tripple murder case - Robbery - Circumstantial evidence - Recovery of blood stained weapons - Prosecution failed to establish that weapons recovered were used for commission of crime - Medical evidence also indicates that injuries found on the body of deceased persons could not have been caused..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 394, 449, 34, Arms Act, 1959, Section 25, 27-- Tripple murder case - Robbery - Circumstantial evidence - Recovery of blood stained clothes and items - Veracity of recovery is doubtful, as recovery effected 2 days after arrest of accused and recovery of stolen articles from houses of accused which I.O had thoroughly searched previously - FSL..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 394, 449, 34, Arms Act, 1959, Section 25, 27-- Tripple murder case - Robbery - Circumstantial evidence - DIG of police visited the scene of crime shortly after recovery of dead bodies - He inferred that crime may be committed by three persons who were electricians after seeing three tea tumblers and electrical equipments - This inference drawn..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 394, 449, 34, Arms Act, 1959, Section 25, 27-- Tripple murder case - Robbery - Circumstantial evidence - Last seen theory - Last seen witnesses saw entry and exit of accused from crime scene respectively - Witnesses conveyed this piece of valuable information to complainant right before he filed first information - However, there is no whisper..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 394, 34-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Apart from recoveries, prosecution has successfully established chain of circumstances - There is sufficient evidence on record which points to the guilt of accused - Call detail records of accused, recovery of mobile phone instrument of deceased from accused,..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 27, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 394, 302, 411-- Disclosure statement - Robbery - Recovery of stolen article on the pointing of co-accused - No effort made by I.O to take any independent witness while making recovery - Recovery of stolen article not fulfill the mandatory requirement of S.27 of Evidence Act and same is thus, doubtful...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 394, 302, 411-- Robbery - Incident by three unknown persons and complainant stated that he can recognize them, if they are brought before them - However, no Test Identification Parade done by police authorities after arrest of accused - Recovery of stolen article not proved on record - Prosecution failed to prove..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 392, 394, 302-- Robbery and murder - A-2 roped into crime only on the basis of mobile conversation with deceased - Mentioned Sim was in possession of A-2 as a result of which he was apprehended - However, said Sim number did not stand in the name of A-2 - Prosecution failed to establish that A-2 had conversation..........

Showing : 1-10 of 116 Results