Showing : 1491-1500 of 14513 Results

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 307, 451, 34-- Attempt to murder - Unless panch witness positively states that he has eye-witnessed the recovery, his mere signature on such recovery panchnama becomes useless in proving the recoveries...........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 307, 451, 34, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3-- Attempt to murder - Panchas not supported contents of panchnama - Their evidence cannot be considered at all...........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 307, 451, 34, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3-- Attempt to murder - Appreciation of evidence - 3 injuries caused to complainant by single blow of razor - Not possible - As per evidence on record, injuries caused to complainant were neither serious in nature nor sufficient to cause death in natural course jointly or severally - Even, on the same..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 149, 323, 302-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - As per statements of prosecution witness it is apparent that accused were not initially named as accused/appellants when statement on the basis of which FIR was registered, was recorded - Even, at the stage of making supplementary statement, PW1 did not name..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 408, 420-- Quashing of FIR - Offence u/s 408, 420 IPC - Compromise arrived at between parties - Compromise is genuine and there was no undue influence or coercion from any side - FIR along with all consequential proceedings quashed qua petitioner only...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 397, 401, 227-- Revision - Charges framed u/ss 354, 354-A, 354-B, 341, 342, 376(2)(f), 376(2)(k) IPC - As per statement of victim u/ss 161, 164 Cr.P.C. she has interacted with her peers and friends disclosing her anguish at the conduct of applicant/accused both in respect of incident and apology tendered by..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 328, 201, 34-- Double murder - Circumstantial evidence - Conduct of PW7, who is key witness of prosecution is unnatural and unbelievable and her testimony cannot be accepted - Contradictions and improvements found in evidence of PWs - Prosecution story inextricably mixed up with falsehood that separation of..........
PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, Arms Act, 1959, Section 27, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3-- Murder - Appreciation of evidence - Appeal against conviction - As per evidence on record there is material contradictions in the evidence of witnesses and they do not seem to be reliable - Even, PW6 eye-witness gave contradictory version with regard to occurrence - Neither blood stained clothes..........
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 201, 120B, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Examination of evidence and materials on record shows that circumstantial evidence surrounding commission of offence clearly connects accused persons with offence - Even, evidence of child witness is corroborated on material particulars - Moreover, last seen..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 448, 341, 380, 34-- Trespass and theft - Specific allegations levelled in FIR that petitioners trespassed into portioned premises under occupation of complainant in her absence and stole goods lying there - Merely because petitioners claim that they were in possession of some portion of same premises would not mean..........

Showing : 1491-1500 of 14513 Results