Showing : 9331-9340 of 13717 Results

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106-- Right of private defence - Plea not taken before the trial Court - Such a suggestion also not given to PW's - Anything related to private defence not stated in examination u/s 313 Cr.P.C. - Appellants had failed to show that right of private defence had arisen to them...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, 156(3), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 218, 219, 420, 120A, 120B-- FIR registered on directions given u/s 156(3) Cr.P.C. for an offence u/ss 218, 219, 420, 120-A, 120-B IPC - Allegation that medico legal report prepared was a fabricated document - Injured medically examined by different doctors/Board of doctors, who all concurred that medical report of injured..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 406-- Criminal breach of trust - The pith and marrow of complaint is that accused/Hospital has charged excess amount for medical treatment - Held, it cannot be said that accused/Hospital has committed offence u/s 406 of IPC...........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 468, 470, 473-- Criminal breach of trust - Cognizance after expiry of limitation - It is alleged that accused/Hospital has committed an offence u/s 406 of IPC on 18.06.1992 - Complainant filed a private complaint on 09.07.2000 - Magistrate, by order dated 25.05.2006, has taken cognizance for offence u/s 406 of..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 149, 148, 448, 324-- Conviction - In an appeal filed by some of accused conviction altered to one u/s 304 Part I read with S.149 - Facts of that appeal are applicable to the present appeal filed by another accused - Accordingly conviction altered to one u/s 304 Part I read with S.149 IPC as was done in the other..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 147, 148, 149, 302, 34-- Bail - Offence u/s 147, 148, 149, 302 & 34 IPC - Five accused - FIR lodged promptly - Deceased sustained injuries - Manner in which the deceased was murdered was brutal - Gravity of offence considered - Bail refused...........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 201-- Murder - Conviction - Eye witness stated in his cross examination that he had not seen appellant killing his wife - He admitted that he has no knowledge about killing of deceased by appellant - Extra judicial confession made by accused before police - No evidentiary value - Conviction set aside...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376, 366-- Rape - Consent of prosecutrix - Prosecutrix was more than 18 years of age on the date of commission of offence - Prosecutrix remained in the company of appellant for 1 month and 28 days - No report was lodged by father of prosecutrix when she was found missing - Conduct of prosecutrix shows that..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 120B-- Agreement to sell - Suit for specific performance filed - FIR lodged u/ss 420, 120-B IPC whereby it is alleged that complainant had handed over the blank stamp papers signed by his wife as security for obtaining the loan and agreement to sell was forged - Dispute not civil in nature - Petition to..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302-- Murder - No reliable or acceptable evidence that the offence had been committed by the appellant and no direct or circumstantial evidence brought on record to establish the guilt on the part of he appellant - Conviction cannot be sustained...........

Showing : 9331-9340 of 13717 Results