LawMirror.com

Results of ipc s 300

Showing : 131-140 of 362 Results

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 300, 304 -- Murder or culpable homicide - Prior to incident there was verbal quarrel between accused and deceased and thereafter they dispersed - Subsequently accused came, waylaid deceased and attacked him with Aruval - Held, act of accused moving from the place where verbal quarrel took place and coming with an Aruval and causing death of..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 300, 304Part II, 34 -- Murder or culpable homicide - Allegations that accused and her husband committed murder of their two years old child by wrongfully confining her in bathroom for 14 days without food as she would bring ill luck to them - Medical evidence showing cause of death due to starvation - Death of child in bathroom established..........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 300, 392, 397 -- Robbery and murder - Accused attacked deceased and injured with chopper and removed ornaments from body of deceased - Intention and motive proved in view of ferocious attack on victim and injuries inflicted and gravity of injuries - Acts of accused fall under Clause 3 or Clause 4 of S.300 IPC - Conviction, held, proper...........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 300, 34 -- Common intention - Accused `B' and `J' caught hold father of deceased till very end, thereby facilitated commission of murder of deceased - Held, this shows common intention of accused `B' and `J' with that of main accused...........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 300 -- Murder - Some of the accused not named in FIR - Injured eye witness fit to make statement but their statements recorded after 2 days - Even in these statements names of accused omitted which were omitted in the FIR - No other independent witness worth taking note - Held, these accused entitled to acquittal...........

JHARKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 300, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 285, 286, 337, 338, 304A, Factories Act, 1948, Section 92 -- Rash and negligent act by petitioner/occupier or Manager of factory resulting into death of worker - Petitioner has not been convicted and/or acquitted in either of case as Section 92 of the Factory Act do no prescribe punishment for..........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 300(4), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 406, 420, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 3(1)(x) -- Complaint for offence u/ss 406, 420 IPC and S.3(1)(x) and (xi) referred to police for investigation u/s 156(3) Cr.P.C. - Police had earlier filed charge sheet qua the same occurrence for..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 300, 220 -- Distinct offence - Second trial - Permissibility - Petitioner and accused `P' were not indicted for offence u/s 380 or 411 of IPC in earlier FIR - No finding of acquittal or conviction with regard to these 11 artifacts/articles has been given, which is the subject matter of that earlier FIR - Second FIR lodged after three..........

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 300, 149 -- Unlawful Assembly and murder - Appreciation of evidence - Name of one of the accused did not find mention in the FIR - However, her name was mentioned by the deceased in the statement made to the police recorded on the next day and also in the dying declaration - Other eye witnesses stated that the accused whose name was omitted..........

GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 300 -- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Proof of motive - Not necessary - Held, even in a case based on circumstantial evidence, when facts are clear, it is immaterial that no motive has been proved - Mere failure to discover motive by appropriate clinching evidence may be a weakness in proof of prosecution case, but it is not necessarily..........

Showing : 131-140 of 362 Results