Showing : 351-360 of 815 Results

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420-- Cheating - Consent given by prosecution, to sexual intercourse with a person with whom she is deeply in love on a promise that he would marry her on a late date, cannot be said to be given under a misconception of fact - However a representation deliberately made by accused with a view to elicit..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Agreement to sell - Failure to execute sale deed - For that civil remedy is available - There was no dishonest intention from the very beginning to cheat the complainant or to commit an offence of criminal breach of trust - FIR quashed...........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 467, 468, 471-- FIR registered under - Petition for quashing FIR on ground that both parties were claiming Hibanama in their favour and civil suits were pending filed by both sides regarding Hibanama - Whether FIR filed when civil suits were pending was liable to be quashed? Yes...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 406, 420, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Conviction of accused u/s 138 NI Act - Further prosecution u/ss 406, 420 IPC is barred...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 197, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1), 13(1)(d), 19, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 467, 468, 471, 420-- Public servant - Sanction for prosecution - Sanction granted u/s 19 of Act of 1988 for offence u/s 13(1) and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act and S.420 IPC - Sanction not granted for offence u/ss 467, 468 & 471 IPC - Held, once sanction has been granted u/s 19 of 1988 Act no further..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 406, 120B, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Section 3, 4-- Quashing of FIR - (i) Delay in lodging FIR - It is an issue which is to be adjudicated upon by the trial Court; (2) Whether there is direct evidence or circumstantial evidence to prove the existence of offence u/s 120-B IPC is naturally a matter of investigation; (3) Whether the intention to cheat..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 406, 120B-- Offence u/ss 420, 406, 120-B IPC - Complainant convicted u/s 138 NI Act - Complainant alleging misuse of the same very cheque - Such a frivolous prosecution cannot be permitted to be continued - Order taking cognizance quashed...........
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420-- Cheating - Quashing of proceedings - No case of complainant that petitioners tried to deceive him either by making false or misleading representation or by any other action or omission nor he was fraudulently or dishonestly induced to deliver property - Hence, no offence u/s 420 was made out -..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B-- Order of cognizance - Quashment - No case of forgery of documents committed after document was custodia legis - S.195 Cr.P.C. wrongly applied - Impugned order set aside...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 274, 275, 276, 420, 120B, Trade Marks Act, 1940, Section 103, 104, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Section 17B, 27-- Bail - Offence u/ss 274, 275, 276, 420, 120-B IPC, Ss.103, 104 Trade Marks act & Ss.17-B, 27 of Drugs and Cosmetics Act - Nature and gravity of the accusation and severity of the punishment in the event of conviction are the guidelines which have to be kept in mind while granting bail...........

Showing : 351-360 of 815 Results