Showing : 1-10 of 14 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 379A-- Theft - Mobile snatching - PW1 identified accused first time in Court - No Test Identification was held - Identification of accused thus, doubtful having regard to passage of time - When mobile phone of PW1 was snatched he would have seen accused only for few seconds - It is doubtful whether PW1..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 379, 201-- Stealing of bond - Signing of bond is not sufficiently proved, thus question of snatching away by accused does not arise - I.O should have enquired with opponent of accused who were said to be present on date of production of alleged agreement bond - Delay of 2 days in filing of complaint after..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 379, 201, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 114-- Theft - Adverse inference - Allegation that accused stole the bond paper on which settlement among three parties including accused was recorded - It is not believable that accused after snatching bond will again come back on the same day and no action is taken against accused - Adverse inference..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 382, 324, 411-- Snatching - Petitioner pleaded that gold chain, which was snatched, has not been recovered from him and it has been recovered from co-accused - One of accused remained on motorcycle and other accused went to complainant and asked for Saini Mohalla and then after giving threat, snatched gold chain..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 458, 392, 394, 397, 34-- Lurking house trespass - Voluntary causing hurt in committing robbery - Accused allegedly armed with knife robbed gold chain of complainant and inflicted injuries to her - However, vital contradictions in the statements of PWs about robbing gold chain - Complainant did not furnish any description..........
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 394, 324, 411-- Voluntary causing hurt in committing robbery - Accused alone caused hurt to PW4 with the weapon before snatching away her golden ornaments - Neither any person other than accused caused alleged hurt nor any person was jointly concerned in alleged commission of offence of robbery - Injury sustained..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 392, 397, Arms Act, 1959, Section 25-- Robbery - Robbed article i.e mobile phone was not recovered from possession of accused - Complainant did not state if present accused after snatching mobile from him had handed over it to associate on motorcycle - PWs gave divergent statements regarding recovery of knife - No other public person..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 353, 350, 348-- Criminal force - Conviction - Validity - Accused alleged to have taken away ballot box which Polling Officer had placed on a table - Held, it would amount to snatching away ballot box by use of criminal force within meaning of S.350 IPC - Because of snatching away of ballot box Polling Officer was..........
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 395, 412, Arms Act, 1959, Section 25(1AA)-- Dacoity - Accused brandished dagger and chisel and snatched away suit case of complainant containing valuable articles - Complainant suffered incident of snatching and statement found credible - Physical loss caused to complainant due to snatching of articles which were subsequently recovered by..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 227-- Discharge of accused - Criminal case u/s 147, 450, 382, 307, 357, 506, 149, 109 of IPC - Earlier to the registration of criminal case, dowry complaint filed by complainant in which two accused were arrested - Thus they were not present at the scene of occurrence for which police case registered -..........

Showing : 1-10 of 14 Results