LawMirror.com

Results of joint property

Showing : 721-730 of 758 Results

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1991
Details

Limitation Act, 1963, Article 110 -- Suit by a person excluded from joint family property, to enforce a right to share therein - Limitation is twelve years - Limitation commences when the exclusion becomes known to the plaintiff...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1990
Details

Partition -- Deori Kalan was left joint property of all the branches of the joint family for the purpose of ingress and egress to their respective parties - Change in circumstances - There is no bar in law that the property which was kept joint of the parties cannot be subsequently partitioned...........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1990
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 11 -- Res Judicata-Earlier'X' filed suit claiming title through his father, who was `Karta' of the family-Suit decided - Subsequent suit filed by `X' when property was still joint claiming title - Barred by res judicata...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1990
Details

Court Fees Act, 1870, Section 7(v)(a) -- Alienation of Joint Hindu Family Property - Challenged by son that the sale is without legal necessity - Since suit has been filed under Hindu Law as such question of paying ad valorem Court Fee on the sale price does not arise. (1990 Civil Court Cases 240 (P&H) followed)...........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1990
Details

Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 2, 5, 44 -- Decree for joint possession - Plaintiff and his family deprived of the use of basic amenities as toilet, bath room & tap - Suit claiming damages - Decreed...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1989
Details

Court Fees Act, 1870, Section 7(v)(a) -- Alienation of Joint Hindu Family Property - Challenged in a suit for declaration that sale is without legal necessity and without consideration claiming consequential relief of possession - Held, suit has been filed under the Hindu Law as such question of paying ad valorem Court Fee on the sale price does not arise...........

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1989
Details

Hindu Law -- Agreement to sell - Manager entered into agreement for sale of Joint Family Property - Legal necessity not proved - No proof that creditor made bonafide enquiry as to legal necessity - Money taken by the Manager cannot be enforced against the legal representatives. (Specific Relief Act, 1963, Ss.10, 15)...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1989
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10 -- Suit for specific performance of contract of sale - Person not a party to the agreement claiming to be joint owner of suit property - Not entitled to be impleaded as a party as he is neither a necessary nor proper party to the suit. (Specific Relief Act, 1963 S.19)..........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1989
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 -- Promissory note - Executed by one member of joint family when he was manager of the family - Creditor filing suit against him only and decree obtained against him - Decree was not drawn against executant as manager of joint family or to be executed out of joint family property - Decree not binding on their members of joint family, nor..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 1989
Details

Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 106 -- Notice under - Death of tenant leaving behind respondent, his mother, brothers and sisters - Notice u/s.106 served on the respondent alone terminating the tenancy - As heirs succeed to the tenancy as joint tenants and not tenants in common as such notice served on the respondent alone is sufficient...........

Showing : 721-730 of 758 Results