Showing : 361-370 of 453 Results

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, Section 29-- Minor - Joint Family Property - No legal guardian can be appointed in respect of undivided interest of the minor in joint family property unless minor is the sole surviving coparcener...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Hindu Law-- Sale of joint family property by Karta - Legal necessity - Payment of income tax of more than 3 lakhs - Sale to meet debt of firm - Plea that all members of HUF not partners of firm - Not tenable - Business of firm was business of family - Legal necessity cannot be disputed...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Hindu Law-- Joint family property, sale of - Legal necessity - Joint family properties attached for non - payment of Income Tax - Sale of property for purpose of benefit of joint family and thus for legal necessity...........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Agreement to sell-- Suit for specific performance - Joint family property - Alienation by Karta - Death of Karta - Finding of legal necessity arrived at in his favour - Alienation was for benefit of joint family - Members of family filing several litigations in collusion with other members to frustrate sale agreement..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Hindu Law-- Joint family - Doctrine of blending - It means throwing separate property of a member of the joint family into common hotchpotch...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Hindu Law-- Joint family - Coparcenary - Coparcenary is a much narrower body than the joint family as it includes only those persons who acquire by birth an interest in joint or coparcenary property - The conception of a joint Hindu Family constituting a coparcenary is that of a common male ancestor with his..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Hindu Law-- Joint Family Property - Alienation by Karta - Legal necessity - Defendant claiming sale to be for legal necessity to meet joint family expenses, such as expenses for education, marriages of their children and for treatment of wife of plaintiff who died in the year 1982 as well as to meet the..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Hindu Law-- Joint Family Property - Alienation by Karta - Legal necessity - Onus is on the plaintiff to prove that alienation was not for legal necessity - In absence of any material as to what was the annual or monthly income and what was the expenditure of the family, it is difficult to conclude that the..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17-- Written statement - Amendment - Suit for specific performance - L.R's of defendant seeking amendment of written statement to take up the plea that suit property is ancestral coparcenary/Joint Hindu Family Property and the proposed alleged sale vide the agreement in question was neither for..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Hindu Law-- Joint Hindu Family property - Alienation by Manager of Joint Hindu Family without legal necessity - Sale is voidable and not void...........

Showing : 361-370 of 453 Results