Showing : 381-390 of 457 Results

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Hindu Law-- Father purchased property fallen to the share of his brothers in partition - Said property cannot be treated as joint family property in the absence of evidence that the said purchase was made by father with the income derived from the property fallen to his share in partition with his brothers..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 32, Rule 3-- Minor - Joint Hindu Family Property - Defendants including minors forming Joint Hindu Family - Decree in dispute qua property of Joint Hindu Family will bind its minor members as well...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Temporary injunction - Claim based on property alleged to be joint family property - Parties Muslims - Concept of joint family property alien to Muslim Law - Defendants admittedly in possession - No prima facie case for restraining defendants from putting up construction - Injunction declined...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Hindu Law-- Hindu Joint Family Property - Liability of sons to pay the debts of his father - Obligations rests on the sons of the deceased whether they are major or minor to discharge the debts incurred by him to the extent they had inherited the property on his death or to the extent of their interest the..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 102, 103-- Plea by defendant No.3 that the contribution for the purchase of the property was out of the joint family fund - It was for the defendant No.3 to lead cogent evidence in that regard rather than expecting the plaintiffs to disprove the same...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Hindu Law-- Joint family property - Merely because some of the properties continue to stand in the name of plaintiff in the revenue records that by itself cannot lead to the conclusion that the property purchased by any one member of the family necessarily be a part of the joint family property particularly..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 33, Rule 1-- Permission to sue as indigent person - Expression 'Sufficient means' refers to sufficient realisable assets convertible into cash to pay Court-fee - Mere title to property with no dominion thereon does not amount to possession of 'sufficient means' - Rejection of application of person whose only..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Joint Family Property - Alienation by Karta - If sale is for legal necessity or benefit of the estate or for meeting the antecedent debts then Karta cannot be restrained from alienating the coparcenary property...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Hindu Law-- Joint Family Property - Alienation by Karta - It is not the rule of law that Karta is required to consult other members of the family and obtain their consent for the purpose of alienating the Joint Family Property - The requirement of law is that if alienation of joint family property is made by..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 3-- Joint Family Property - Property partitioned among co-sharers - Sale of some property by co-sharers - One co-sharers challenged validity of alienation - Vendors being co-sharers not impleaded - Challenge is not permissible...........

Showing : 381-390 of 457 Results