Showing : 381-390 of 452 Results

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 102, 103-- Plea by defendant No.3 that the contribution for the purchase of the property was out of the joint family fund - It was for the defendant No.3 to lead cogent evidence in that regard rather than expecting the plaintiffs to disprove the same...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Hindu Law-- Joint family property - Merely because some of the properties continue to stand in the name of plaintiff in the revenue records that by itself cannot lead to the conclusion that the property purchased by any one member of the family necessarily be a part of the joint family property particularly..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 33, Rule 1-- Permission to sue as indigent person - Expression 'Sufficient means' refers to sufficient realisable assets convertible into cash to pay Court-fee - Mere title to property with no dominion thereon does not amount to possession of 'sufficient means' - Rejection of application of person whose only..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Joint Family Property - Alienation by Karta - If sale is for legal necessity or benefit of the estate or for meeting the antecedent debts then Karta cannot be restrained from alienating the coparcenary property...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Hindu Law-- Joint Family Property - Alienation by Karta - It is not the rule of law that Karta is required to consult other members of the family and obtain their consent for the purpose of alienating the Joint Family Property - The requirement of law is that if alienation of joint family property is made by..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 3-- Joint Family Property - Property partitioned among co-sharers - Sale of some property by co-sharers - One co-sharers challenged validity of alienation - Vendors being co-sharers not impleaded - Challenge is not permissible...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17-- Amendment of written statement - Suit claiming share in property of deceased along with defendants - Resisted on the ground that plaintiff not the daughter of deceased and therefore suit not maintainable - Amendment seeking to add that suit land joint Hindu family ancestral and coparcenary..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Partition Act, 1893, Section 4-- Partition - Joint Family Property - No finding regarding previous partition by metes and bounds between co-sharers - Suit for partition by one co-sharer - Dismissal on ground of prescription of title by adverse possession by other co-sharer - Illegal...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1997
Details
Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, Section 8, Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, Section 29-- Hindu Joint Family Property - Agreement to sell executed by father acting for himself and as natural guardian of his minor sons in respect of Hindu Joint Family Property - Such an alienation not altogether prohibited under law but only voidable - Minor sons after attaining majority not taken steps..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1997
Details
Hindu Law-- Joint Family - Partition - Partition deed executed - Once intention to separate is expressed in a document, it results in severance of joint status - Its legal effect cannot be altered by subsequent conduct of parties - All properties of joint family not divided under the deed is of no consequence..........

Showing : 381-390 of 452 Results