Showing : 41-50 of 113 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Joint trial -- Accused cannot assert any right to a joint trial with his co-accused...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Family Courts Act, 1984, Section 10, 19-- Joint trial - Family Court has power to order joint trial where parties are common and evidence is also likely to be common - Fact that different appellate or revisional remedies are provided, does not mean that it fetters Family Court's power to allow joint trial...........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Joint charge - Quashing - All different groups of accused are alleged to have committed offences at different points of time arising out of different transactions - No application as contemplated under proviso to S.233 was filed - None of conditions contemplated in clauses (a) to (g) of S.223 were..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, Section 15-- Bombay bomb blast case - Confessional statement recorded u/s 15 of TADA - Arms Act, 1959, S.3, 7 r/w S.25(1-A), (1-B)(a) - Contention on behalf of Sanjay Dutt that since he has been acquitted of all charges under TADA, confession ought not to have been relied upon for convicting him for offences..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 1, 3, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 2, Rule 3-- Joint trial - Circumstances requisite to allow joint-trial are (1) A common question of law or common question of fact must arise from all such suits and (2) In all such suits, the right to relief must be in respect of or arising out of same act or transaction or same series of act or transactions..........
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, 155(4), 196(1A), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 500, 505(2)-- Quashing of proceedings - Joint trial of no, cognizable offence and cognizable offence - Quashing of proceedings initiated on cognizable offence - Effect - Held, no, cognizable case should be treated as a cognizable offence till the end of trial provided that there is prima facie case for trial..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 30-- Statement of a co-accused implicating another accused - Admissibility of - Held, during trial, the statement of a co-accused implicating another accused in a joint trial is not inadmissible in view of S.30 of Evidence Act, especially if other corroborative material is available against co-accused...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Temporary injunction - Grant of - Plaintiff had not been able to prove that property in dispute was joint property of the parties - Trial Court was of the view that appellant will not suffer any irreparable loss in case suit is decided finally, but has failed to consider that if it comes in the..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Dishonour of cheque - Territorial jurisdiction - Transfer of complaint - Both complainant as well as accused reside in district of Keonjhar - Alleged loan in cash was given by complainant to accused at Keonjhar - Purported cheque given by accused to complainant was at Keonjhar - Complainant..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 219-- Joint trial - Double murder case - Form conglomerated whole - No snipping link between the two - Form part of same transaction - Contention that joint trial could not have been framed negated...........

Showing : 41-50 of 113 Results