Showing : 41-50 of 122 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 13B-- Divorce by mutual consent - Brother, attorney of petitioner, can make statement at the second motion - Trial Court cannot compel the personal presence of petitioner - Trial Court can refuse to record the statement of attorney if he is not duly constituted attorney and if Court comes to conclusion..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 498A, 304B, 34, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Section 4, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439-- Bail - Dowry death - Petitioner father-i, law of deceased himself informed complainant about demise of deceased without any delay - No ante mortem injury on body of deceased - No possibility of petitioner influencing any witness since statements of all witnesses is already recorded by trial Court..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Constitution of India, 1950, Article 32-- Murder case - Monitoring of investigation - Murder of political leader in broad day light - Investigating agency showing slackness and disinterest in investigation - Some of accused persons absconding - Held, Joint Director CBI directed to monitor investigation done by CBI - Trial commenced..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Joint trial -- Accused cannot assert any right to a joint trial with his co-accused...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Family Courts Act, 1984, Section 10, 19-- Joint trial - Family Court has power to order joint trial where parties are common and evidence is also likely to be common - Fact that different appellate or revisional remedies are provided, does not mean that it fetters Family Court's power to allow joint trial...........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Joint charge - Quashing - All different groups of accused are alleged to have committed offences at different points of time arising out of different transactions - No application as contemplated under proviso to S.233 was filed - None of conditions contemplated in clauses (a) to (g) of S.223 were..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, Section 15-- Bombay bomb blast case - Confessional statement recorded u/s 15 of TADA - Arms Act, 1959, S.3, 7 r/w S.25(1-A), (1-B)(a) - Contention on behalf of Sanjay Dutt that since he has been acquitted of all charges under TADA, confession ought not to have been relied upon for convicting him for offences..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 1, 3, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 2, Rule 3-- Joint trial - Circumstances requisite to allow joint-trial are (1) A common question of law or common question of fact must arise from all such suits and (2) In all such suits, the right to relief must be in respect of or arising out of same act or transaction or same series of act or transactions..........
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, 155(4), 196(1A), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 500, 505(2)-- Quashing of proceedings - Joint trial of no, cognizable offence and cognizable offence - Quashing of proceedings initiated on cognizable offence - Effect - Held, no, cognizable case should be treated as a cognizable offence till the end of trial provided that there is prima facie case for trial..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 30-- Statement of a co-accused implicating another accused - Admissibility of - Held, during trial, the statement of a co-accused implicating another accused in a joint trial is not inadmissible in view of S.30 of Evidence Act, especially if other corroborative material is available against co-accused...........

Showing : 41-50 of 122 Results