Showing : 71-80 of 120 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 468-- More than one offence - Joint trial - Limitation - Held, in view of S.468(3) Cr.P.C. cognizance of an offence can be taken by Magistrate taking into consideration that it is a case of joint trial then limitation prescribed for offence which is punishable with highest punishment has to be..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 380, 452, 506-- Tractor with other articles removed from house by breaking the locks of house - Plea of accused that tractor was purchased from joint family funds - Further plea that only interested witnesses examined - Trial Court and Appellate Court rejected both the pleas - Protracted trial of 11 years -..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 200, 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 34-- Complaint - Conspiracy to put society and its members to a great loss - Allotment of plot to a person not entitled thereto - Report of Joint Registrar Co-operative Societies that actual consideration is Rs.28 lacs whereas it is shown as Rs.10 lacs - Report whether can be relied upon to be decided..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 218-- Framing of joint charges - Duty of court - Held, Court has to consider the travails and tribulations that victim and other witnesses might face if trial is held separately, as prayed for by petitioners - Prosecution is also likely to examine several female students who are studying under the..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 4-A-(As in U.P.) - Consolidation of suits - When two or more suits or proceedings are pending in the same court, and the court is of opinion that it is expedient in the interest of justice, it may by order direct their joint trial, whereupon all such suits and proceedings may be decided upon the..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 219-- Dishonour of two cheques - Joint complaint - Maintainability of - Held, as per S.219 Cr.P.C. if the offences are of same kind and punishable with same punishment under same section, court can try these offences of same kind committed within a year together - In present case, both cheques were..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 223, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 307, 504-- Joint trial - Offence u/s 302 IPC and another offence u/ss 307, 504 IPC - Incident took place in the same village on the same day - Time and place of occurrence of both incidents different - Prosecution witnesses also different - Held, that since the eye witnesses to be examined in both the cases..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 14, Rule 1-- Additional issues - Suit for specific performance - Application u/O.1 R.10 by sons of vendor claiming that suit property is Joint Hindu Family Property and vendor is merely a co-parcerner therein, having 1/7 share - Rejected by Trial Court - Application by vendor for framing additional issues..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 24-- Remand - Joint submission of parties that public documents not considered by trial Court and it should be considered by appellate Court - There was no necessity of remanding the matter - Order of remand set aside - First Appellate Court to decide case itself...........
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 20, Rule 18-- Suit for partition - Property in exclusive name of respondent - Appellant failed to adduce evidence to confirm that joint family property nucleus had sufficient funds to acquire suit property and therefore it was joint property - Respondent led sufficient evidence that he purchased family land..........

Showing : 71-80 of 120 Results