Showing : 31-40 of 219 Results

TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), Telegraph Act, Section 7B-- Telephone bill - Rental for non - return of the instrument after disconnection of Telephone - There is no deficiency in service - This kind of dispute will not come within the jurisdiction of Consumer Forum and the same comes under Section 7B of the Telegraph Act - The order of the District Forum..........
THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 3, Punjab Cooperative Societies Act, 1961, Section 82(2)-- Jurisdiction - Bar of jurisdiction - Plea that where a Cooperative Society is being wound up, no suit or other legal proceedings relating to the business of such Society shall be proceeded with or instituted against the liquidator as such or against the Society or any member thereof, except with..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d), 2(1)(e), 12, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997, Section 14-- Complaint maintainability - Cable services - Dispute between two 'service providers' - Held to be not a 'consumer dispute' since it is not between 'service provider' of a 'consumer' - Respondent No. 1 does not fall within the ambit of definition of a 'consumer' u/s 2(1)(d) of the CP Act, 1986 -..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 12(3), 18, 22, 24A(2)-- Complaint - Admissibility of complaint - District Forum u/s 12(3), State Commission u/s 18 of the Act and National Commission u/s 22 of the Act are competent to decide the admissibility of complaint - If complaint does not disclose any grievance which can be redressed then concerned forum can..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 12, 2(g)-- Deficiency of service - Allotment of land to co-operative societies for construction of flats for allotment of same to its members - Some members sought refund of earnest money - Refund allowed after deducting 10 percent from earnest money - Aggrieved members approached the Consumer Forum -..........
PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 12-- Complaint maintainability - Plot allotment - Non completion of construction - Non construction fee - Raising of demand by appellant/OP Improvement Trust - Held that the Fora under the CP Act have no jurisdiction to decide the correctness of the composition fee/non - construction fee etc. -..........
HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(e)-- Consumer dispute - Plot/site - Auction purchase - Extension fee - Jurisdiction - The Consumer Forum has no jurisdiction to go into the correctness of demand of extension fee - It cannot be decided in the complaint filed by the complainant...........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(e), 13(1)(c), 14(1)(d)-- Spurious soft drink - Absence of test report - Compensation - Enhancement of compensation - Two bottles of soft drink produced before the Commission wherein in one bottle there appears a housefly lying in it which is visible with naked eye - Other bottle also has a foreign object - Finding..........
PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 17(1)(b)-- Revisional jurisdiction - Complaint - Dismissal for want of prosecution - Application by respondent that the Counsel wrongly noted the date as 2.3.2010 instead of 24.2.2010 - District Forum in its wisdom restored the complaint which was dismissed for want of prosecution - Order not interfered with..........
RAJASTHAN STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, JAIPUR
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 3, 14(1)(d)-- Banking service - Bank locker - Burglary - Criminal case - Deficiency in service - Complaint maintainability - Held that the Consumer Forum has jurisdiction, even if a criminal case is pending before the criminal Court, as reliefs sought are different in nature and the relief which could be..........

Showing : 31-40 of 219 Results