Showing : 51-60 of 219 Results

PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(f), 11-- Defective laptop - Jurisdiction - Only controversy to be decided whether the Laptop had developed the defects within the permissible period and whether there was any fault on the part of the appellant in damaging the Laptop and related apparatus - The Consumer Fora cannot run away from its..........
WEST BENGAL STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOLKATA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d)-- Consumer - Commercial purpose - Banking service - Cheque encashment - Cheque provisionally credited turned out to be a forged and overwritten one - The Forum as per the provisions of the CP Act has no jurisdiction to adjudicate matters involving prime facie forgery/mutilation/overwriting in..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11(2)(c)-- Territorial jurisdiction - Open Marine Policy - Insurance claim - Open Marine Policy for 152 bags of Khandsari which was purchased at Bareilly, U.P. from respondent at Barriely - The policy was issued to the policy holder who was located in Siliguri - The Declaration of the consignment was issued..........
RAJASTHAN STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, JAIPUR
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 17-- Pecuniary jurisdiction - Valuation in plaint by the complainant determines the jurisdiction of the Court or Forum or Commission - The allegation in the written statement is not relevant for determining the pecuniary jurisdiction...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(b)-- Consumer forum - Jurisdiction - A consumer forum will have jurisdiction only when : (i) the complainant is a `consumer' as defined in clause (d) or a person specified in clause (b) of section 2 of the Act; (ii) the respondent is a `trader' as defined in clause (q) or a provider of `service' as..........
THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11(2)-- Territorial jurisdiction - Plot allotment - Plea that the office of appellant - OP is situated at Panchkula thus only Panchkula Forum was vested with the territorial jurisdiction repelled - As the deposited amount was refunded to the complainant within the territorial jurisdiction of Chandigarh..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b)-- Revisional jurisdiction - Plea of maintainability of complaint - The point was conceded before the District Forum that complaint maintainable - This point was not taken before the State Commission - The petitioner debarred from taking a position contrary to it at the stage of revision...........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11-- Pecuniary jurisdiction - New plea - Appellate stage - Issue relating to pecuniary jurisdiction not taken at the earliest before the District Forum - The issued raised before the State Commission at appellate stage - The same could not be entertained by the State Commission at the appellate stage...........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b)-- Revisional jurisdiction - Ex parte order - Findings recorded by the Fora below are findings of the fact based on the evidence present on record - Cannot be set aside on the basis of the supposed version of the petitioners which they could take before the District Forum and lead evidence in support..........
RAJASTHAN STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, JAIPUR
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11-- Territorial jurisdiction - Cause of action - Medical negligence - Held that cause of action in consumer transactions arises generally at the place where the goods are bought or services are hired, or where the goods are delivered or supplied or services are rendered and the jurisdiction is..........

Showing : 51-60 of 219 Results