Showing : 71-80 of 219 Results

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d)(ii)-- Consumer - Retiral benefits - Government servant - Delayed payment - Complaint maintainability - Held that the complainant being a Government servant, his complaint itself not within jurisdiction of the Fora below - Order passed by the State Commission as well as of the District Forum allowing..........
UTTARAKHAND STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, DEHRADUN
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11(2)-- Territorial jurisdiction - Contract of insurance having been entered at Rishikesh by issue of cover note by the Development Officer of the Insurance Company which is within jurisdiction of the Dehradun District Forum - Dehradun District Forum has the jurisdiction despite the fact that insurance..........
MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(e), Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982-- Consumer dispute - GPF advance - Appellant retired compulsorily - Not applied for final payment of GPF but for GPF advance which was rejected by employer - Such a dispute between the employer and ex employee regarding advance of G.P.F. is not a consumer dispute - The Forum below rightly held that..........
DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 12(1)(b) , 3-- Telecommunication Regulation Act, Section 14 - Bar of jurisdiction - Complaint under Section 12(1)(b) of the CP Act filed on behalf of numerous consumers is not barred by provisions of Section 14 of the TRAI Act on the premise that is a dispute between licensor and group of consumers - The word..........
H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11(2)-- Territorial jurisdiction - Plea that car was sold at Chandigarh and dealer as well as manufacturer do not have their either registered office or branch office within the territorial jurisdiction of the District Forum Shimla as no part of cause of action arose in favour the respondent to maintain..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) , 14(1)(d)-- Compensation - Cold storage - Potato stock - Storage of in cold store - Held that it is the duty of the concerned Redressal Forum to assess and determine in the light of evidence available in the case what amount would reasonably go to compensate the petitioner on account of negligence of OP - The..........
HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) , 14(1)(d)-- Car booking - Misappropriation of amount - Complicated questions of fact - Summary jurisdiction - Simply because the complainant had lodged the complaint with the police and the police had sent the cancellation report does not come in the way of the District Forum to decide the complaint - The..........
MADHYA PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BHOPAL
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11(2)-- Territorial jurisdiction - Education - Distance education - Agreement between the parties that all disputes were triable exclusively by Courts/ Forum at Hyderabad - Appellants are having their branch office/ study centre at Indore - Cause of action also has arisen wholly at Indore - So..........
THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11(2)-- Territorial jurisdiction - Shares certificates - Transfer of - Only OP is situated at Mumbai and no cause of action at all had occurred at Patiala - Since none of the conditions of Section 11(2) were before the Forum, it wrongly proceeded with the complaint though it patently lack in necessary..........
THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 14-- Summary jurisdiction - Shares transfer - Fraud alleged - Same cannot be adjudicated by the Forum sitting under the summary jurisdiction of CP Act under which the allegations in the complaint have to be with regard to deficiency in service or unfair trade practice - Fraud clearly outside the..........

Showing : 71-80 of 219 Results