Showing : 121-130 of 219 Results

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 17(1),(b)-- Revision - Held that before a revisionist can ask for revising the impugned order, he is to show that the District Forum has either failed to exercise jurisdiction which it did not possess or the District Forum has acted in exercise of its jurisdiction with material irregularity and illegality...........
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11-- Pecuniary jurisdiction - Ordinarily the value put up by the plaintiff in his complaint that prima facie determines the pecuniary jurisdiction - The want of pecuniary jurisdiction is no longer an inherent lack of jurisdiction - If the Court or Forum finds that it has no pecuniary jurisdiction to..........
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MADHYA PRADESH
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11(2)-- Territorial jurisdiction - Insurance claim - Insurance policy issued at Bangalore for which premium was deposited through CANCOMFORT Card at Jabalpur - Repudiation of claim also conveyed at Jabalpur - Held that complaint before District Forum, Jabalpur has the territorial jurisdiction as part of..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21-- Pecuniary jurisdiction - Banking service - Inflated claim - Claim for compensation of Rs.47,17,012/- made in complaint is the cheque amount alleged to have been withdrawn from OP Bank on the basis of forged authority letter - Alleged claim of Rs. 250.10 lakhs on account of loss suffered in..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11(1)-- Pecuniary Jurisdiction - Purchase of Plot in auction for 62 laks - Claimed number of reliefs and valued reliefs notionally at Rs. 195/- though the reliefs claimed was of Rs. 17,82,025/- including interest @ 18% p.m. - Complaint ordered to be returned by the State Commission for being presented..........
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g), Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1986, Section 13(1),(B),15,28-- Railway service - Deficiency in service - Bar of jurisdiction - District Forum has got the jurisdiction to decide the case...........
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11(2)-- Territorial jurisdiction - Airlines - Findings of the District Forum that neither any cause of action had arisen to the complainant to file the complaint at Jalandhar as OP No.2 has no branch office at Jalandhar held erroneous - OP No.1 having its office at Jalandhar was the agent of OP No.2 to..........
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 14-- Insurance claim - Summary jurisdiction - Allegation of the tampering of the driving license - Held that it could not be tried in the summary jurisdiction of the Forum and the case required detailed evidence of the parties including the enquiry into the allegation of fraud and tampering - Order of..........
MADHYA PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BHOPAL
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11-- Territorial jurisdiction - Internet Contract - Domain name - Registration of Domain name - Online offer for registering the domain trade name on certain conditions - Merely because the appellant contacted on internet (from Gwalior) for registration and gave an offer, acceptance of which was to be..........
MADHYA PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BHOPAL
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11-- Territorial jurisdiction - District Forum dismissing complaint holding that it had no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the complaint - Order upheld - However, District Forum instead of dismissing the complaint ought to have returned the complaint to the complainant for its presentation to the..........

Showing : 121-130 of 219 Results