Showing : 21-30 of 63 Results

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Jurisdiction - Cheque issued by accused at Delhi from account maintained in a Bank at Delhi - Complainant deposited the cheque at Pune with its bankers for presentation to the drawee bank at Delhi - Complainant's bank at Pune does not become banker to whom the cheque is..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142-- Dishonour of cheque - Complainant - Territorial jurisdiction - Cheques in question were issued at Meerut - Cheques were sent for collection to drawee Bank at Meerut - Even notice of demand u/s.138 of N.I. Act was served upon petitioner at Meerut address - Entire cause of action for filing..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138,142-- Dishonour of cheque - Territorial jurisdiction - Held, payee has an option to present cheque in any bank including collecting bank where he has his account - But to attract criminal liability of drawer of cheque such collecting bank is obliged to present cheque in drawer's bank on which cheque is..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Territorial jurisdiction - Held, place where cheque has been drawn and place, where cheque returned unpaid by drawee bank and place where statutory notice demanding payment of cheque was served on drawer, are the places where Court shall have jurisdiction to entertain and..........
H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 14, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14-- Summary Jurisdiction - Banking service - Fixed deposits - Fraud and forgery - Serious allegations relating to fraud, forgery and connivance of bank have been leveled on the part of the bank with regard to FDR's - In the present case proper course for the appellant is to approach the civil Court in..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142-- Dishonour of cheque - Territorial jurisdiction - Held, payee of cheque has the option to present the cheque in any bank including the collecting bank where he has his account - But to attract criminal liability of drawer of cheque such collecting bank is obliged to present cheque in drawee or..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Contract Act, 1872, Section 31, 32-- Agreement to sell - Insistence of settlement of a bank loan and handing over the title deeds to the vendor - Not an impossible event - Contract does not come to an end on this ground and such contract is not a contingent contract - Court has jurisdiction to grant relief in terms of the contract...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Jurisdiction - Accused company that is the drawer, based in Kanpur issued cheque on the drawee bank which is also placed in Kanpur - Payee company i.e. complainant having branch office at Kanpur but corporate office at Gurgaon - Cheque in question was presented for collection..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Jurisdiction - Place where the bank of accused, which has dishonoured the cheque is situated cannot be regarded as the sole criteria to determine the place of offence - A place, for the purpose of invoking the provision of S.138 of the Act, depends on a variety of facts...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Jurisdiction - Substantial part of cause of action arose within jurisdiction of Courts at Delhi - Complainant, a public limited company, having its registered and corporate office at Delhi - Cheque presented in a Bank at Delhi - Cheques were returned to complainant through..........

Showing : 21-30 of 63 Results