Showing : 21-30 of 331 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Rules, 1908, Rule 15, 20-- Appointment of Lambardar - Govt. employee - Petitioner working as Lab Assistant in department of health - Held, he cannot be appointed as Lambardar, since duties can only be performed by a person who is available in village, and not by person who is absent throughout the day on account of his..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Rules, 1908, Rule 20-- Duties of Lambardar - Extent of - Held, duties of a Lambardar are not limited in nature - A Lambardar is called upon by revenue, police and administrative officers to assist in various matters like disputes regarding possession of land, demarcation of land, identification of accused persons and..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 13, 16, Punjab Land Revenue Rules, 1908, Rule 15- - Appointment of Lambardar - Significant factor - Held, availability of a Lambardar in village is a significant factor to be considered while appointing a Lambardar - If a question mark is raised upon a candidate's availability in village, Collector would necessarily be required to consider and..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 13, 16, Punjab Land Revenue Rules, 1908, Rule 15-- Appointment of Lambardar - Objection as to availability of candidate - Failure of Collector to consider - Held, it would be an error of jurisdiction liable to be corrected by appellate and/or revisional authority - Principle that choice of Collector is final is a rule of prudence and must,..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 13, 16, Punjab Land Revenue Rules, 1908, Rule 15- - Appointment of Lambardar - Objection as to availability of candidate - Failure of Collector to consider - Rectification thereof by Commissioner - Validity - Commissioner after holding that respondent No.6 would not be available in village rectified error by setting aside order passed by Collector..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226, Punjab Land Revenue Rules, 1908, Rule 15-- Appointment of Lambardar - Objection as to availability of candidate - Judicial review - Respondent No. 6 is a teacher in a Government school - His service requires his presence in school during school hours - If he performs duties of a Lambardar, he will have to remain absent from school thereby..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Rules, 1908, Rule 14, 15, 17-- Appointment of Lambardar - Interference with choice of Collector - Commissioner as well as Financial Commissioner did not record any finding that order passed by Collector was suffering from patent illegality or perversity - Held, unless such finding was recorded by Commissioner or Financial..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Rules, 1908, Rule 14, 15, 17-- Appointment of Lambardar - Validity - Respondent No.2 was defaulter of payment of bills of Public Health Department from June, 2000 till September, 2006 - Proceedings to fill up post in question were initiated in month of April, 2005 - Deposit of amount after Collector appointing petitioner as..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Rules, 1908, Rule 14, 15, 16-- Appointment of Lambardar - Petitioner has colluded with concerned official(s), who conducted proclamation in a clandestine manner so as to ensure that there would be no contest and petitioner would be appointed as Lambardar - Held, such an unhealthy practice is not permissible in law - Order..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Rules, 1908, Rule 15-- Appointment of Lambardar - Validity - Held, once after remand, appellant had been granted ample opportunity to raise all pleas before Financial Commissioner, then question of merit having not been considered by Collector and Commissioner does not arise - Authorities have found respondent No.5 more..........

Showing : 21-30 of 331 Results